鈥淲e consider the UK as a leader in excellent science and innovation so of course having them on board for proposals and projects for us is crucial.鈥� Dr Laura Rodr铆guez should know. As one of the scientific leaders at the heart of an ambitious Europe-funded research effort, Rodriguez has been at the centre of the Europe-wide partnership between her company, IRIS Technology Solutions in Barcelona, and several research partners.

This sharing of expertise has made the research effort more than the sum of its parts, she says. 鈥淭he multicultural and multidisciplinary environment is crucial to the results.鈥� All this is made possible by Horizon Europe, the European Union鈥檚 flagship 鈧�96 billion research and innovation funding program.

The goal of Rodriguez鈥� collaboration is to minimise the environmental footprint of the pharmaceutical industry by rethinking the entire life cycle of medicines鈥攆rom the moment a molecule is designed to how a patient disposes of the leftover pills. The science is so complex that it requires the expertise of world class researchers, innovative small-to-medium sized enterprises (SMEs) and leading pharmaceutical companies from across Europe. That鈥檚 how IRIS Technology Solutions has come to partner with UK companies such as Quotient Sciences,聽headquartered in Nottingham,聽as well as the pharmaceutical giant AstraZeneca.

Cleaner Chemistry

鈥淭he manufacture of pharmaceuticals generates more waste and by-products compared to all other chemical sectors [per quantity of end product],鈥� says Dr Sara S脿nchez, also at IRIS. For every kilogram of medicine, the industry produces more than ten kilograms of waste and by products, far more than industries that are generally thought of as 鈥渄irtier鈥� such as petrochemicals. While fuels are produced in massive, continuous flows, medicines are typically manufactured in discrete batches. This requires frequent, intensive cleaning between products, which generates significant chemical runoff and waste.

鈥淭he nature of these wastes and products have a huge impact on the environment,鈥� says Rodr铆guez, 鈥渟o it is not only about the amount of waste and sub-products, but also the complexity of the chemicals and the dangers they pose.鈥�

To tackle these issues, the Horizon Europe innovation programme has funded a 鈧�5.9 million project called ETERNAL which brings together 16 partners from across the continent in a 4-year partnership. The project is exploring green chemistry techniques to help reduce the use of solvents and help minimise residues in wastewater; it is studying mechanochemistry鈥攈ow mechanical forces like grinding and compressions can trigger chemical reactions and reduce the reliance on solvents and energy-hungry heat; and developing digital twins to create virtual replicas of manufacturing processes that predict how changes will affect the environmental impact before a single chemical is poured.

A 鈥渃lean鈥� supply chain doesn鈥檛 end at the factory gate; it includes the patient. So ETERNAL is launching campaigns to influence behaviour by nudging consumers to dispose of medicines responsibly, for example by returning unused pills to a pharmacy rather than flushing them down sinks and lavatories.

Positive reactions

The challenge begins with the way drugs are designed to start with. In the early stages of drug development, pharmaceutical companies are generally focused on bringing effective and safe medicines to market quickly. So, factors such as the amount of by-product produced can become a secondary concern. The result is that inefficient chemical pathways can become locked into the manufacturing processes.

One way to change this is to better understand reactions as they are in progress. To this end, IRIS and Quotient are using a technique called Raman spectroscopy, a kind of chemical fingerprinting technique that monitors chemical reactions while they are in progress, allowing more control and therefore less waste.

The technology involves firing a laser into the reaction vessel and analysing the light that comes back. That light is frequency-shifted based on the vibrations of chemical bonds in substances within the mixture, allowing the researchers to infer how quickly a reaction is progressing. If adjustments to reaction conditions such as temperature or pressure are needed, they can be done in real-time without the chemicals needing to be sampled.

But neither partner could have done this on their own. IRIS has expertise in building the optical hardware and creating the software to analyse the results, while Quotient has the detailed understanding of the complex chemical reactions at work.

Dr Rowena Howie at Quotient鈥檚 Alnwick site says the company could not have pursued the Raman approach on its own. 鈥淥ne of the best things about our collaboration with IRIS is the access it gives us to technology and expertise that we wouldn鈥檛 otherwise have,鈥� she says.

Once the technique has been fully validated, it should open up a new pathway to understanding and monitoring the chemical processes at the heart of drug manufacture more precisely. 鈥淭he real-time interface is what鈥檚 really going to help,鈥� she says.

And the hope is that the partnership will continue beyond ETERNAL, allowing the technique to be applied to other chemical processes.

IRIS also collaborated with AstraZeneca to develop membranes that filter active ingredients or impurities from solvents, a technique that uses significantly less energy than traditional separation techniques like distillation. A key task is to find the best pore size for the filter, which would conventionally be done with multiple experiments that are time consuming and wasteful.

Digital twins

IRIS has built a digital twin of the process 鈥� a computer simulation that models the fluid dynamics around the pores, incorporating the properties of the solvent, the solutes and the membrane. 鈥淎 digital simulation, of course, is much cheaper and faster,鈥� says IRIS鈥檚 Dr David Nettleton. It allows researchers to run dozens of 鈥榳hat-if鈥� scenarios鈥攙irtually testing different experimental parameters鈥攖o identify the most efficient process before a single drop of real chemical is used.

Again, this is a problem that neither side could have cracked on its own. Nettleton describes the partnership as an iterative process, where AstraZeneca defined the problem and IRIS built prototypes of the simulation model. 鈥淲e get the feedback 鈥� and we make updates,鈥� he says, until the simulation is a close approximation to its real-life twin.

This free flow of ideas between participants in the collaboration has been crucial to this success, says Dr Rory MacDonald at Quotient Sciences. 鈥淎ll partners, I think, have just been completely open.鈥� That openness will outlive the formal end of the ETERNAL project in August because much of the data will be put in the public domain. 鈥淚t will be delivering benefits in terms of reduced environmental impact with all the various partner companies that have worked here,鈥� he says.

Rodr铆guez agrees that on the scientific level, working together has been 鈥渇luid and collaborative鈥� while personal connections have thrived. But there is one realm where national rivalries have proved impossible to eliminate.

鈥淲e try not to talk about soccer,鈥� she admits. In Barcelona, a proud footballing city, European collaboration it seems has its limits.

Find out 听听

Listen to the 快猫短视频 Colab podcast, How UK and Spanish scientists are reimagining the future of green pharma

It鈥檚 nowhere near early enough for those of us in the northern hemisphere to start struggling against winter鈥檚 somnolent spell, so there鈥檚 no need for excuses as you take to your bed with a pile of good books. And there鈥檚 plenty to keep you occupied while you eschew the chilly outdoors. This month, we have climate hope from a well-placed environmental reporter, formerly of this parish, an honest memoir from a star scientist and a jaw-dropping account of the commodification of women鈥檚 bodies. Given the Valentine鈥檚 Day fun this month, we also have a book that may challenge what we thought we knew about finding love. It鈥檚 always good to get all the help we can in that department 鈥� enjoy!

by Maggie Aderin

鈥淥n clear moonlit nights we sometimes step outside and howl at the moon together. It is cathartic, primal and a really good laugh. I am not sure what our neighbours think about it, though.鈥� That鈥檚 Maggie Aderin, describing how she and her daughter share their love of the moon in her memoir, Starchild. Aderin is one of the UK鈥檚 top science popularisers (a co-host of the BBC鈥檚 astronomy programme, The Sky at Night) and has groundbreaking work on the James Webb and Gemini telescopes under her belt. Oh, and there鈥檚 a 鈥淒ame鈥� in front of her name in recognition of her work 鈥� and a Barbie doll of her made by Mattel. Starchild is the story of her complicated early life (custody battles, 13 schools in 12 years, dyslexia), and how she came to set her ambitions on star science, only to end up the only Black woman on her physics course at Imperial College London. From the sneakiest of sneak peeks, it looks like a thoroughly engaging read 鈥� and the kind of honest memoir you wish more scientists would turn out.

The best new popular science books of 2026

Clear out your shelves for a bumper new crop of books by authors including Naomi Klein, Rebecca Solnit and Xand Van Tulleken, says culture editor Alison Flood

by Gaurav Suri and Jay McClelland

How do our brains turn relatively simple units 鈥� biological neurons 鈥� into a mind? It鈥檚 quite a story: with 86 billion neurons making an estimated 100 trillion connections across neural networks, the human brain is a miracle of complexity. But the assembly that underpins human intelligence, desire and even consciousness also allows mind-like abilities to emerge in machines built using artificial neurons 鈥� and our chatbots use artificial neural networks originally developed as models of the mind. How does it all work 鈥� and where does it leave AI? A good place to look for answers is The Emergent Mind by Gaurav Suri and Jay McClelland. The two academics straddle computational neuroscience, experimental psychology, computer science and linguistics. And their book comes highly recommended by such luminaries as Geoffrey Hinton, who won the 2024 Nobel for physics, and Mustafa Suleyman, who co-founded DeepMind.

by Paul Eastwick

Is the object of your affections a 9, while you are just a 5? Are some folk just not 鈥渕arriage material鈥�? These sound like crude assessments to use when looking for romantic connection, yet much of the world seems hooked on this kind of thinking. But just how scientific is it really? Luckily, it looks as if we may soon have some evidence-based answers, judging by Bonded By Evolution by Paul Eastwick. He鈥檚 a psychologist at the University of California, Davis, and director of its Attraction and Relationship Research Laboratory, and he says those ideas have penetrated deep into our culture, creating narratives that make us despair about relationships or, worse, fuel misogyny and violence. Here鈥檚 hoping science can come to the rescue.

by Michael Pollan

With 350 theories of consciousness on the table, is there room for even one more? Luckily, A World Appears isn鈥檛 really another contender. For one thing, it鈥檚 by Michael Pollan, a writer and thinker who somehow manages to be both left-field and highly influential through books about our relationship with plants and psychedelic drugs, especially How to Change Your Mind. And this book seems to be not so much theoretical as experiential, with Pollan using many different lenses (neuroscience, psychology, philosophy, psychedelic) to explore the field in a personal manner. He starts with a chapter about the famous wager between neuroscientist Christof Koch and philosopher David Chalmers more than 25 years ago on whether science would have an explanation for consciousness by 2023. Given the scale of the problem, 25 years plus isn鈥檛 really that long 鈥� so Pollan ends up in a cave outside Santa Fe looking for different kind of answers and offers a wonderful exit quote: 鈥滻 open my eyes and a world appears鈥︹�� Great stuff.

by Sarah Alam Malik

Any book with a title like that is bound to put you in mind of Stephen Hawking 鈥� and take you right back to 1988 when A Brief History of Time came out to great acclaim 鈥� and even greater sales. But there鈥檚 a subtitle in parentheses after the 鈥楿niverse鈥� 鈥� (and our place in it) 鈥� which throws a switch on things and brings this new exploration of cosmology up to date, putting more emphasis on the people doing the work. Sarah Alam Malik鈥檚 own field is dark matter, so she and Hawking would have found some common ground in the weeds of big science.

Free newsletter

Sign up to Book Club

Sign up to newsletter

by Gwen Adshead and Eileen Horne

How could forensic psychiatrist Gwen Adshead and Eileen Horne follow on from their earlier book, The Devil You Know, which journeyed into the hell of the people who commit the worst acts in the world? The subtitle explains that we will be getting 鈥�Stories of survival and transformation after trauma鈥� 鈥� in other words, and in a very real sense, the other end of the stick. This time, we will share the burden of trauma 鈥� or maybe, survival 鈥� of other kinds of terrible acts. According to publishers Faber & Faber, among the book鈥檚 eight case studies are a war widow who dares not utter her husband鈥檚 name, a former prisoner of war who will not speak of his ordeal even decades later, and a child hostage who cannot speak at all. What happens to them all? Their journey makes a powerful experience. As Adshead says: 鈥淭hey spoke of the unspeakable to me鈥� and thus found a way鈥� to get through their experiences.鈥�

by Adrian Woolfson

This is probably one of the most challenging of this month鈥檚 books. Unless, of course, you are some sort of synthetic biology guru already. Assuming you aren鈥檛, On the Future of Species has a clear agenda: Adrian Woolfson imagines a new world, one in which your home builds itself, your clothes talk back to you, disease is no more and we may even live longer. In other words, life itself will have been decoupled from Darwinian evolution and become computable. And AI will drive the project as it converges with synthetic biology to become something quite new, what Woolfson calls artificial biological intelligence. It all depends, says Woolfson, founder of the genome writing company Genyro, on decoding the generative grammar of DNA. It may then be possible to construct wholly new genomes or rewrite our own if we want. And if all this works out even a bit, then we will want to. Fascinatingly scary stuff to huddle under the duvet with. What could possibly go wrong?

by Joanna Cheek

We鈥檝e all drunk the Kool-Aid: you are responsible for you; no matter how bad you feel, you have agency, you can improve your life 鈥� in fact, only you can! And so on. But what if you don鈥檛 feel you have agency? What if the world is rolling over you, making you depressed and anxious? And breathe鈥� Or better, reach out for a book that at least promises to let you off the hook a bit. It鈥檚 Not You, It鈥檚 the World by psychiatrist and medical journalist Joanna Cheek asks whether our mental health struggles aren鈥檛 actually signs that we鈥檙e broken, but proof that we鈥檙e responding normally to a world in crisis. The book reminds us that 1 in 2 of us will be diagnosed with a mental health condition by the age of 40, and Cheek argues that our symptoms are, in fact, alarms 鈥� and that our defence systems are working exactly as they should in response to threatening circumstances. Best of all, Cheek sets out to show how self-improvement alone neglects the source of our difficulties, and that to truly heal, we must address the imbalances in our wider systems that keep making us all sick. If she delivers even a little of what we鈥檙e promised, it will be a great relief.

by Fay Bound-Alberti

It was apparently following a diagnosis of prosopagnosia (face blindness) that cultural historian Fay Bound-Alberti was inspired to write her new book, The Face. This kind of ironic driver makes you wonder what she makes of her own face. After all, we are living in a world where we must unlock our phones with facial recognition, our faces are stamped in our passports, and no matter how we age or are changed through accident or illness, they remain a foundational marker of identity. Bound-Alberti is the founder of the Centre for Technology and the Body at King鈥檚 College London, where she leads Interface, the world鈥檚 first project examining technologies of the face. So, given her background and condition, we should expect a compelling exploration of how the face has shaped identity and social meaning through time. Publishers Penguin say we will discover how new technologies and cultural innovations have transformed our conception of selfhood, starting with the growth of portraiture in the Renaissance and traveling through the mass production of mirrors and photography in the 19th century to today鈥檚 digital avatars and face transplants.

by Fred Pearce

Everyone expects gloom and doom from environmental and climate experts. But Fred Pearce, a staffer and consultant for 快猫短视频 for many years, is one of the last people on earth to jump into any such neat box. Yes, things are bad and the list of problems endless: extinctions are accelerating, plastics and pollution choke our seas and skies, water cycles (and glaciers) are collapsing. But his purpose is to 鈥渟hine a light on solutions and offer hope in dark times鈥� Too much pessimism can be the enemy of the very action we need.鈥� While accepting the damage done, Pearce finds reasons (seven, actually) reflected in chapters with titles ranging from 鈥淣ature is finding a way鈥�, and 鈥淭he population bomb is being defused鈥� to 鈥淭he miracle of the commons鈥�. Fearing that he might sound Panglossian, in the end Pearce鈥檚 hope comes down to two things: nature鈥檚 ability to regrow, adapt and restore itself; and humans themselves, and our ability to adapt, not just technically but socially, and to rediscover the wisdom of older ways: 鈥渢o imagine the best, then mobilize and act on it鈥�. Who wouldn鈥檛 say amen to that?

by Alev Scott

From the end of the 20^th century, women鈥檚 fertility has increasingly become all about technology, money and morality. Twenty-five years into the 21^st century, the questions just keep on coming. Here鈥檚 a selection from Cash Cow by Alev Scott, one of the first books to bring it all together in a detailed, often undercover investigation of the whole area. Should women be paid to be surrogates or should this be an altruistic act 鈥� or even legal at all? Why should women pay more for 鈥淰IP鈥� egg donors and to view their photos? Is it right to charge for breast milk? If so, how much 鈥� and who should be allowed to buy it? Then there鈥檚 the issue of one person鈥檚 biological bad luck being another鈥檚 gain as the example of women鈥檚 eggs 鈥� from freezing to selling 鈥� shows all too clearly. Scott鈥檚 account looks to be riveting for everyone who cares about the increasing commodification of women鈥檚 bodies and the horror show of the (largely ignored) emotional and ethical issues it raises.

聽by Jo Marchant

Former 快猫短视频 staffer Jo Marchant has form 鈥� in a good way. Among the books she has written, she is probably best known for Decoding the Heavens, about the聽Antikythera mechanism, an ancient device聽designed to calculate聽astronomical聽positions that is popularly known as the first known mechanical computer. Her latest book is very different. It鈥檚 her personal quest in search of 鈥渘ow鈥� 鈥搘hat it means to live in the present, right here, right now. Who hasn鈥檛 asked themselves that? Illusion or not, we feel the present is, in every sense, all we have or can have. But physics finds no universal 鈥渘ow鈥�. The book is an existential quest: drawing on neuroscience, psychology, cosmology, religion, history and much more. In it, Marchant delves deep into the weeds of lived experience (mystical or otherwise) and possibly the nature of reality itself. As she writes, 鈥淧erhaps, with our help, the whole universe is continually being made and remade. And the future isn鈥檛 written after all.鈥�

The best new popular science books of January 2026

A host of new science books are due to hit shelves in January, by authors including Claudia Hammond, Deborah Cohen and Daisy Fancourt

聽by Jo Wimpenny

Everyone loves an underdog. Except when it comes to certain animals, or why would zoologist Jo Wimpenny feel the need to make the case for 鈥渞ethinking nature鈥檚 least loved animals鈥�? It turns out, there are good reasons for rehabilitating creatures that we perceive as harmful, thus wasps provide free pest control, snakes offer venom that might help with cancer, and crocodiles and vultures can teach us about social bonds. Then there is the even bigger picture: losing certain animals, no matter how repulsive, would devastate ecosystems. And all sorts of creatures are being found to possess intelligence way beyond our expectations. We clearly have no business disliking any creature. Still, at least we no longer persecute animals for 鈥渃rimes鈥� as we did in the Middle Ages. Small mercies鈥�

聽by Evan Selinger and Albert Fox Cahn

Just in case you don鈥檛 get the title, it鈥檚 a play on that famous tech bro quote (by Mark Zuckerberg to be precise) about moving fast and breaking things. That once sounded pretty sexy, all that innovation, disruption and speed. Except that it also spawned a techno-utopian culture of fabricated benefits and minimised harms. The opposite may be less frantic. More, er, evidence-based, even. It definitely sounds like it鈥檚 worth taking a close look at how we got here and what it would take to create a responsible innovation culture. And to make it sound sexy.