¿ìè¶ÌÊÓÆµ

Letter: Protection, for whom?

Published 26 April 2003

From Michelangelo D'Agostino

Your special report on nanopollution contains a misleading caption (29 March, p 14). The use of multimillion-dollar clean-room facilities and protective masks and clothing doesn’t spring from the need to protect researchers from nanoparticles, but to protect nanoparticles from researchers. Stray dust, hair or moisture from a person can spell disaster for nanoparticles or even for conventional semiconductor materials.

Street, Somerset, UK

Issue no. 2392 published 26 April 2003

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with ¿ìè¶ÌÊÓÆµ events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop