Sheena Cruickshank, Author at żěè¶ĚĘÓƵ Science news and science articles from żěè¶ĚĘÓƵ Fri, 05 May 2017 14:54:40 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1 242057827 Can a new history of vaccination silence doubters? /article/2125350-can-a-new-history-of-vaccination-silence-doubters/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=currents&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS /article/2125350-can-a-new-history-of-vaccination-silence-doubters/#respond Wed, 22 Mar 2017 18:00:18 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2125350 vaccination
No contest: if you fear the needle, try reading about the disease
BSIP/UIG via Getty Images

EVERY year, millions of children and adults are vaccinated against diseases that only a few decades ago were terrifying and deadly, including rubella, polio and measles. Meredith Wadman’s meticulously researched book begins with the heart-rending account of a baby girl born in 1964 who survived just 16 months before succumbing to the effects of maternally transmitted rubella. She spent only nine days of her life outside hospital.

cover.jpg.rendition.460.707

The fear and horror these diseases cause is a fading memory, and despite the fact that vaccines work, the sceptics are gaining ground, their claims given credence by a handful of Hollywood stars and now by US president Donald Trump.

Vaccination is based on the principle, developed by , whereby the body’s immune system, inoculated with a killed or weakened pathogen, naturally creates a protective response to the disease.

As well as describing the science, Wadman explores the motives of those involved in the vaccination story, particularly , whose vision of a safer route to vaccination led to a long-running dispute.

Though many early vaccines worked well, side effects were always a concern, sometimes because the virus was still infectious, sometimes because proteins were present that triggered severe immune reactions. Many vaccines were tested, without consent, on prisoners, orphans and even newborn babies.

Early vaccines also used cells from other animals. Often the dead or weakened viruses were grown in monkey cells as these, it was wrongly assumed, contained no transmissible infections. Cell lines from human tumours did exist, but were considered unsafe: what if cancerous cells were transferred along with the vaccine?

Wadman describes the scandalous cover-up following the discovery that monkey cells used in vaccinations were infected with a virus, SV40, that could infect humans. Intervention from wealthy non-scientists such as the philanthropist drove even deeper investment into animal-based vaccines despite growing evidence of their lack of safety and efficacy.

Step forward Hayflick. Based at the Wistar Institute in Philadelphia, he was a gifted young scientist who reasoned that fetal cells derived from a normal pregnancy would be a virus-free and safe alternative for vaccine development. In 1962, he obtained tissue from an aborted fetus, grew the lung cells and created a new cell line, WI-38.

“Many early vaccines worked well, but sometimes the virus was still infectious”

In 1968, Hayflick discovered that the institute’s director had filed a patent for the WI-38 cells to be used in a rabies vaccine, but that he wasn’t named on the patent. Infuriated, Hayflick left the Wistar, taking all the WI-38 cells with him. As he battled to get the cells licensed and his colleagues recognised for their work, he hid the cells in his garage.

Much has changed. Many modern vaccines use only those parts of the pathogen that stimulate the immune response, so there is no chance of infection. Still, the history of vaccines is not a romantic tale. It’s a success story for grown-ups.

Detailed and discursive, The Vaccine Race isn’t an easy read. But among its detailed descriptions of cell preparation, discursive descriptions of the issues around abortion, and the story of the discovery that normal cells have a finite lifespan, there is plenty of ammunition for those arguing with family or Facebook friends who have swallowed the conspiracy theories of the anti-vaccination community.

[book_info title=”The Vaccine Race: How scientists used human cells to combat killer viruses” author=”Meredith Wadman” publisher=”Doubleday” title_link=”https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/1099755/the-vaccine-race/”]

This article appeared in print under the headline “In place of disease, unease”

Ěý

]]>
/article/2125350-can-a-new-history-of-vaccination-silence-doubters/feed/ 0 2125350
This is Your Brain on Parasites: strong stories, shaky science /article/2090968-strong-stories-shaky-science/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=currents&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Wed, 01 Jun 2016 14:00:00 +0000 http://mg23030762.900 cat
What sinister force makes rodents attracted to the smell of cats
Robert Holmgren/Getty
THE mere mention of parasites can make the skin crawl, and yet these organisms provide some astonishing examples of biology. Take crickets, and their fraught relationship with water. Once infected by parasitic worms, they hurl themselves into water where they can easily drown. This apparent suicide bid enables the worms to reproduce. Toxoplasma parasites make rodents attracted to open spaces and the smell of cats, which, in turn, eat them and help the parasite complete its life cycle. Parasitic wasps turn cockroaches into “zombies” that they drive back to their burrows. The cockroaches act as both home and larder for the wasps’ developing young, which devour them from within. 9780544192225_hres The idea of parasites modifying host behaviour is called the manipulation hypothesis, and it was brought to the attention of the general reader in 2000 by Carl Zimmer’s Parasite Rex. Journalist Kathleen McAuliffe is fascinated by such gruesome stories, and they form the basis of her book. McAuliffe, a science journalist, is at her best when she focuses on the scientists, describing how far they go to pursue their hypotheses. One, for example, threatened to go on hunger strike when his funding application was rejected. Such stories reflect the passion, fervour and struggles of the researchers. Unfortunately, McAuliffe has a casual disregard for what parasitology actually is. This is best illustrated in the two chapters on how the microbiome – the collection of bacteria, yeasts and viruses that live in and on us – is thought to change behaviour. Bacteria in the gut, for example, signal to the brain when we have eaten enough. Some researchers reckon that if our gut bacteria misfire we may become obese. Interesting as this is, our microbiome isn’t parasitic: its organisms are vital helpers that offer us many advantages. In any case, bacteria, fungi and viruses aren’t usually considered parasites; parasites are organisms that have to live in or on a specific host, from which they take what they need in order to survive and reproduce. The borders of this discipline are fuzzy, but they are there.

“Our microbiome is not parasitic: its organisms are vital helpers that offer us many advantages“

Oblivious, McAuliffe skips into attention-grabbing territory armed with only the flimsiest of evidence. She claims, for example, that infection makes us more sociable and sexually voracious as the parasite seeks to infect others. This is based on (it being unethical to give people actual influenza). The subjects’ increased sociability might have been due to viral manipulation, but for my money it’s more likely they were simply feeling confident about being protected from infection. McAuliffe also argues that, having evolved disgust to avoid potential contaminants, we find these feelings underlie certain religious practices and belief systems. For example, people in infection-prone areas would be more likely to be prejudiced to outsiders for fear they will bring in contagions. This is heady stuff, but it is purely speculative. If there is evidence to support it, I couldn’t find it here. Relatively little of this book is about parasites proper. Psychological theories about behaviour predominate, and the evidence for these is largely anecdotal. The major issues in parasitology – how parasites can persist in a host, hiding from our immune response and adapting to the host environment – aren’t dealt with at all. McAuliffe’s sincere aim is to present the parasite as a master behavioural manipulator. In doing so, she has overlooked some amazing parasitology research.

This is Your Brain on Parasites: How tiny creatures manipulate our behavior and shape society

Kathleen McAuliffe

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt

This article appeared in print under the headline “Hidden persuaders”]]>
2090968