Philippa Nuttall, Author at żěè¶ĚĘÓƵ Science news and science articles from żěè¶ĚĘÓƵ Thu, 06 Oct 2022 09:52:56 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1 242057827 How will Germany navigate its gas shortage nightmare this winter? /article/2340492-how-will-germany-navigate-its-gas-shortage-nightmare-this-winter/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=currents&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Fri, 30 Sep 2022 10:46:46 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2340492 2340492 Could Labour’s Great British Energy firm spark a green revolution? /article/2340142-could-labours-great-british-energy-firm-spark-a-green-revolution/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=currents&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Wed, 28 Sep 2022 15:57:50 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2340142 Britain's main opposition Labour Party leader Keir Starmer delivers his keynote address to delegates third day of the annual Labour Party conference in Liverpool, north west England, on September 27, 2022. (Photo by Oli SCARFF / AFP) (Photo by OLI SCARFF/AFP via Getty Images)
Labour leader Keir Starmer at the party’s conference in Liverpool on 27 September
OLI SCARFF/AFP via Getty Images

The UK’s Labour party is promising to place renewable energy at the heart of its economic policy if it wins the next general election, with plans for a publicly owned energy firm and significant investment in green infrastructure.

“We will set up Great British Energy in the first year of a Labour government,” the party’s leader Keir Starmer told delegates at its conference in Liverpool on 27 September. “A new company that takes advantage of opportunities in clean British power.” It would be publicly owned because this makes most sense for jobs, growth and “energy independence from tyrants like Putin”, he said.

At the moment, many UK energy resources are owned by foreign governments and companies. For example, the largest onshore wind farm in Wales is owned by Sweden and the Chinese government has a stake in new nuclear plants including Hinkley Point C. “Five million people in Britain pay their bills to an energy company owned by France,” said Starmer, referring to EDF, largely owned by the French state and in the process of being fully nationalised.

But would public ownership really make a difference in helping the UK achieve its legally mandated goal of net-zero emissions by 2050?

Some industry experts have reacted positively to the announcement. Great British Energy is “exactly the kind of daring plan that will be required to accelerate the transition”, says , CEO of Ember, a UK energy think tank.

Others are less convinced. : “Why bother? Private capital is literally falling over itself to get into renewable energy generation in the UK.”

But this view reflects “a real myopia that wind and solar is all there is”, says MacDonald. It is expected that these technologies, which are already well funded, will grow to make up 70 to 80 per cent of the UK’s electricity generation by 2030, he says, but other, riskier technologies are needed to make up the rest of a zero-carbon electricity system.

MacDonald says these include massive investment in grid infrastructure, hydrogen, small nuclear reactorsĚý˛ą˛Ô»ĺ carbon capture and storage, technologies that aren’t yet mature and that have struggled to get financial backing. By funding them through a publicly owned energy company, the UK could reduce the risk of commercialising them, he says.

And once commercialised, these new green technologies will be in demand in the rest of the world, which is where the second part of Labour’s plan comes in. On 26 September, Labour’s shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves set out plans for an £8 billion national wealth fund to support the development of green infrastructure, including green steel plants and battery factories, created by revenues from renewable energy. While Norway has built a massive sovereign wealth fund on the back of fossil fuels, the UK would probably be the first country to build such a fund from scratch using renewable energy assets.

All of this means that Labour has also pledged that by 2030, the UK will generate all of its electricity without using fossil fuels. Reaching this goal would be “a huge challenge, but we have the technologies to do it”, says at Green Alliance, a UK non-governmental organisation.

The previous Conservative government under Boris Johnson had already committed to 95 per cent clean power by 2030 and 100 per cent by 2035, but it is unclear whether the latest administration under new prime minister Liz Truss intends to stick to this target. The Truss government is lifting a ban on fracking and energy minister Jacob Rees-Mogg has called for oil and gas firms to get “every last drop” out of the North Sea, but it has also relaxed planning restrictions on onshore wind.

Ultimately, whether Labour can achieve its goal of a green economy depends on continued action on renewables today, given the next UK general election could be around two years away. “If the Truss government removes barriers to renewables deployment and maximises efficiency, this goal can be met,” says at E3G, a UK climate think tank.

Sign up to our free Fix the Planet newsletter to get a dose of climate optimism delivered straight to your inbox, every Thursday

]]>
2340142
Heating homes with hydrogen is bad for both your wallet and the planet /article/2339665-heating-homes-with-hydrogen-is-bad-for-both-your-wallet-and-the-planet/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=currents&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Tue, 27 Sep 2022 15:00:37 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2339665 Hydrogen heating
An artist’s impression of a hydrogen heating unit
petrmalinak/Shutterstock
Hydrogen, often touted as a green alternative to heating buildings with natural gas or other fossils fuels, is unlikely to play a significant role in decarbonising homes, a review of international studies has found. That is bad news for governments, including the UK, that are hoping to use hydrogen as a simple substitute for existing gas boilers. “I think hydrogen is ultimately the silver bullet,” Jacob Rees-Mogg, the UK’s newly-appointed energy minister told the House of Commons on 23 September. “We create it from renewable sources… we use it as an effective battery and it can then, with some adjustments, be piped through to people’s houses to heat them during the winter.”
The future of UK science and innovation
The review by at the Regulatory Assistance Project, a non-governmental organisation, looked at 32 studies from the UK, European Union, California and São Paulo in Brazil. Overall, they show that hydrogen is “less economic, less efficient, more resource intensive and associated with larger environmental impacts”, writes Rosenow. Cost and energy efficiency are two main problems, says Rosenow. Today, more than 95 per cent of hydrogen is produced using natural gas or coal. Carbon capture and storage technology could help reduce emissions from this production, but policymakers largely agree that green hydrogen, made via electrolysis with renewable electricity, is the better solution. But if you are going to use renewable electricity to heat your home, you might as well power a heat pump instead, as this is cheaper and more efficient. “It takes about five times more electricity to heat a home with hydrogen than with an efficient heat pump,” says Rosenow. , according to a recent study. Further, “significant uncertainties” exist over the viability of converting countries’ existing gas networks to hydrogen, and hydrogen infrastructure is more extensive than that needed for heat pumps, increasing environmental impacts, writes Rosenow. “It is difficult to think of any circumstances in the decarbonised future when it would make sense to use hydrogen for heating,” says at the University of Cambridge. When the ambient temperature drops below -20°C, air source heat pumps become less efficient, but even in such cold conditions, “heat pumps still deliver heat with lower carbon emissions than hydrogen boilers”, says Cebon. Countries like the US and Australia, which are also toying with the idea of using hydrogen to decarbonise heating systems, have “huge” renewable electricity potential, says Cebon, which they should use “in the most efficient way possible, via heat pumps”. If they have excess electricity, it will be more profitable to sell it directly via interconnectors “than to waste energy converting the electricity into hydrogen”, he adds. Hydrogen could play a limited role in certain circumstances — Rosenow estimates it could provide “about 1-2 per cent of total [domestic] heating demand”. And, for example, green hydrogen power plants will be required to decarbonise other sectors, such as heavy industry processes, and for the seasonal storage of electricity. With that in mind, countries like the UK should continue existing trials to better understand “important details around the technical challenges of heating with hydrogen”, says Rosenow. Just don’t expect a silver bullet.

Joule

Sign up to our free Fix the Planet newsletter to get a dose of climate optimism delivered straight to your inbox, every Thursday]]>
2339665