Debora Mackenzie, Author at żěè¶ĚĘÓƵ Science news and science articles from żěè¶ĚĘÓƵ Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:05:32 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1 242057827 The covid-19 pandemic was predicted – here’s how to stop the next one /article/2254510-the-covid-19-pandemic-was-predicted-heres-how-to-stop-the-next-one/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=currents&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:00:00 +0000 http://mg24733001.000 2254510 The race to test coronavirus antiviral drugs and vaccines is under way /article/2237073-the-race-to-test-coronavirus-antiviral-drugs-and-vaccines-is-under-way/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=currents&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:00:00 +0000 http://mg24532734.000 2237073 How badly prepared is the world for a coronavirus pandemic? /article/2236218-how-badly-prepared-is-the-world-for-a-coronavirus-pandemic/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=currents&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Wed, 04 Mar 2020 13:00:00 +0000 http://mg24532724.400 2236218 We were warned – so why couldn’t we prevent the coronavirus outbreak? /article/2236221-we-were-warned-so-why-couldnt-we-prevent-the-coronavirus-outbreak/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=currents&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Wed, 04 Mar 2020 13:00:00 +0000 http://mg24532724.700
We have vaccines for flu but not for the covid-19 virus yet
Medstockphotos/Alamy

THE world dodged a bullet in 2003 when a global effort contained the SARS coronavirus, after it jumped from bats to humans in China and . We nearly had another close call when MERS, another bat coronavirus, spilled over into people in 2012.

A year later, Chinese scientists found SARS-like viruses in fruit bats that could infect human cells And in 2016, the World Health Organization put coronaviruses among the top eight known viral threats requiring more research.

So you would think we would have some coronavirus drugs and vaccines by now. But there are none licensed. That is why we are hurriedly testing drugs designed for other viruses to see if they can help, and running expedited trials for experimental vaccines. Why were we so unprepared for a threat we knew about?

After 2003, there was a burst of research, but it was short-lived. “From 2005, it became really difficult to get funding for work on SARS coronavirus,” says Rolf Hilgenfeld at the University of Lübeck, Germany.

This was partly because, when SARS disappeared, there was no obvious market waiting for drugs or vaccines to treat it, says David Heymann at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Only big drug companies have the money and expertise to get drugs or vaccines through human trials, and without a market they can’t invest. But Hilgenfeld says agencies that fund research also lost interest, because “prominent virologists believed that SARS coronavirus was a one-time only thing”.

Compared with other , SARS had an extensive genetic mutation that prompted some virologists to guess that this was what allowed it to suddenly spread in humans – and that such a mutation was unlikely to happen again. They were right about the second part. The covid-19 virus doesn’t have this mutation, but it spreads even better in humans than SARS did.

SARS did inspire some global measures. MERS was rapidly identified in 2012 because the European Union had started funding labs to sequence mystery respiratory viruses. In 2007, a revamped version of the International Health Regulations, a treaty designed to reduce the spread of diseases internationally, required advanced economies to help developing ones improve their capabilities for detecting and controlling disease. But nations mostly invested in global initiatives and “not enough in helping countries take care of themselves”, says Heymann. No countries now meet the requirements of the 2007 treaty.

Another problem is getting people other than doctors and scientists on board. After SARS, China set up a network to spot mystery clusters of respiratory disease. It spotted covid-19 in Wuhan – whereupon local officials stifled efforts to raise the alarm.

Public health experts have warned for years that we need to do better. The next new disease might be worse and, unlike covid-19, totally unexpected.

What happened in earlier pandemics?

It wasn’t that long ago that the last pandemic struck. In 2009, a flu virus from pigs jumped to people. The first serious cases were identified in Mexico but containment efforts were soon abandoned. The virus went on to infect a quarter of the world’s population within a year.

Fortunately its impact was relatively mild. That virus killed only about 1 in 5000 of those it infected. But the covid-19 death rate appears to be around 1 in 100, more in line with the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic.

Almost all those people who survived that infection just over a century ago had normal flu symptoms. But with coronavirus it is different: around 20 per cent of cases fall seriously ill, and many of these people require ventilation to keep them alive until their immune system kills the virus.

If there was a rerun of 1918, in which half the US population was infected within a year, millions might need intensive care in that country alone.

Michael Le Page

Sign up to our free Health Check newsletter for a round-up of all the health and fitness news you need to know, every Saturday

]]>
2236221
Coronavirus may have been circulating undetected in the US for 6 weeks /article/2235972-coronavirus-may-have-been-circulating-undetected-in-the-us-for-6-weeks/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=currents&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Mon, 02 Mar 2020 19:43:59 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2235972 2235972 Covid-19: Why won’t the WHO officially declare a coronavirus pandemic? /article/2235342-covid-19-why-wont-the-who-officially-declare-a-coronavirus-pandemic/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=currents&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:42:44 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2235342 Woman having her temperature taken
Passengers arriving from Italy at Debrecen International Airport, Hungary are being screened for signs of covid-19
Akos Stiller/Bloomberg via Getty Images
The World Health Organization confirmed a covid-19 pandemic on 11 March. Prepare for a pandemic, says the World Health Organization, as the global spread of covid-19 soars by the hour. It’s not a matter of if, but when, say US health officials. Yet so far the WHO refuses to actually call covid-19 a pandemic. Why? The answer may lie with what kicks into gear when we deploy the P-word. Countries have pandemic plans that are launched when one is declared, but these plans may not be appropriate for combating covid-19 – and the WHO doesn’t want countries to lurch in the wrong direction. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention : it spreads between people, and it kills. The third is that it has to spread worldwide. The virus is now in 38 countries – and counting – on nearly all continents, and those are just the ones we know about. How much more worldwide does it need to be? Epidemic experts say there are no global criteria. There used to be for flu pandemics, but the WHO abandoned them when it was criticised after declaring a flu pandemic in 2009 that triggered expensive countermeasures in some countries, which some deemed unnecessary. That bruising could be one reason the WHO seems anxious to avoid the P-word now. But there is a more important one. There are two kinds of response to a growing pandemic. The first is containment: as cases appear, you can isolate each person then trace and quarantine their contacts. That worked for SARS and the 2014-2016 Ebola outbreak. The second is mitigation. If containment only slows the virus, eventually you get “community spread”: people are infected without knowing how they were exposed, so you can’t quarantine all contacts. All you can do is slow the epidemic so it won’t peak massively and quickly, overloading health facilities. You close schools, cancel mass gatherings – or as China did, and Italy is now doing, shut down whole cities when they have community spread. Flu skips between people so quickly that containment is a non-starter. Pandemic plans are mostly designed for flu, including those of the and the , and they go straight to mitigation. The UK plan suggests containment only if a new pandemic flu hasn’t learned yet to spread as fast as normal flu. In this light, statements from WHO start to make sense. “It’s not either/or,” said WHO director Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus this week. “We must focus on containment while doing everything we can to prepare for a potential pandemic.” David Heymann, who led the WHO’s fight against SARS, says “you need both containment and mitigation”. Bruce Aylward of the WHO, just back from heading an international mission to China, reports that it used full-on mitigation – stopping travel, keeping people inside, shutting down the huge city of Wuhan – in Hubei province, which had community spread before control efforts even began. As a result the epidemic stopped climbing and new cases are falling steeply, says Aylward. Everywhere else, China stopped community spread from developing by contact tracing and quarantine – and reminding everyone to wash their hands and monitor their temperature. Some places also used mitigation measures such as cancelling public gatherings, school and work as well. The key, says Aylward, was tailoring the approach to local circumstances. That seems to be the WHO’s concern: call this a pandemic, and countries will apply blanket measures designed for flu. “People think it’s like SARS so you do things that way, or it’s a pandemic so you run and mitigate,” Aylward said during a press conference in Beijing. “If we only approach it with a binary SARS-influenza mentality, we are not going to have the agility of approach that we’ve seen in China that is going to be fundamental to beating this on a global scale.” Yet thinking seems to be binary. Nancy Messonnier, head of the CDC’s centre for respiratory diseases, says the US will until it gets – then the strategy will change. Meanwhile the WHO seems to have a third problem with the P-word. “Using the word pandemic now does not fit the facts but it may certainly cause fear,” said Tedros. Asked about the WHO’s reluctance to call a pandemic, WHO spokesperson Tarik Jasarevic said “it is important to focus on actions and not on words.” True – but words matter. Reluctance to tell the public the truth for fear of causing panic has plagued responses to other disease emergencies, notably BSE in Britain. Risk communication experts that not telling the public that containment will not prevent a pandemic – but might still slow it – risks greater shock over what comes next. Sign up to our free Health Check newsletter for a weekly round-up of all the health and fitness news you need to know about ]]>
2235342
Covid-19: Our chance to contain the coronavirus may already be over /article/2234967-covid-19-our-chance-to-contain-the-coronavirus-may-already-be-over/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=currents&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Mon, 24 Feb 2020 12:34:53 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2234967 Police check movement into and out of Casalpusterlengo, Italy, as part of efforts to contain the virus
Police check movement into and out of Casalpusterlengo, Italy, as part of efforts to contain the virus
Piero Cruciatti/SIPA USA/PA Images

The global spread of covid-19 seems to have exploded in recent days, with outbreaks revealed in Iran and Italy and a massive increase in cases in South Korea. Tedros Ghebreyesus, director-general of the World Health Organization, that such cases “show that the window of opportunity we have for containing this virus is narrowing”.

In fact, it may already have shut. On 21 February, epidemiologists warned that we are , “potentially resulting in multiple chains of as-yet undetected human-to-human transmission outside mainland China”. Some of those chains have now been detected, and, ominously, many cases can’t be traced to their source.

Iran has reported 28 cases, but this appears to be a large underestimate because two people who have just flown from Iran to Canada and Lebanon have been found to be infected. Unless people who exit Iran by air are massively more likely to be infected than those who don’t, Gergely Röst of the University of Szeged, Hungary, says it would take 1600 to 2400 cases in Iran to produce two infected travellers – more than any official count so far in a country other than China.

This is especially worrying, says Andy Tatem of Southampton University, UK, as broader travel records show Iran has “strong connections to countries, such as Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan, which have weaker health systems”, meaning they might not detect or contain the virus.

Some countries, such as Singapore, have detected most of the infected travellers epidemiologists calculate they should have got from China. Christl Donnelly and colleagues at Imperial College London have worked out how many infections those countries detected per passenger flight, then compared that to other countries. On average the others detected only a third as many per flight.

“We have decided not to comment on other countries individually,” says Donelly, although the WHO has been informed.

Untraceable cases

South Korea declared a health “red alert” last week as cases soared there. Investigators the source of many of the country’s 833 known cases. Today, the UN granted the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies an exemption from sanctions on North Korea so it could help the impoverished country deal with Covid-19.

We also don’t know the source of many of the 165 cases in northern Italy, and there are a handful of similarly untraceable cases in seven other countries. Until now, efforts to fight the virus have focused on containment, in which all detected cases and their contacts are quarantined. But when there is enough infection about, people catch it without it being obvious who they got it from.

Once the virus spreads “in the community” this way, like flu, containment becomes impossible. That is the “window” Tedros fears is closing.

As containment fails, countries enter the “mitigation” phase of epidemic response, with quarantine replaced by actions such as closing schools, cancelling mass gatherings and similar “social distancing” measures. This is aimed not at preventing the epidemic, but slowing it, so cases won’t peak so fast that they overwhelm medical facilities.

It is possible, even likely, that community spread of the virus may eventually happen in the US, Nancy Messonnier of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . The US is using random screening for the virus in six cities, including Honolulu, which gets heavy air traffic from Asia.

Article amended on 25 February 2020

We clarified the work of Christl Donelly and colleagues.

]]>
2234967
We don’t know how covid-19 spread on the Diamond Princess cruise ship /article/2234734-we-dont-know-how-covid-19-spread-on-the-diamond-princess-cruise-ship/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=currents&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Thu, 20 Feb 2020 17:03:55 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2234734 2234734 Why coronavirus superspreaders may mean we avoid a deadly pandemic /article/2234388-why-coronavirus-superspreaders-may-mean-we-avoid-a-deadly-pandemic/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=currents&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Tue, 18 Feb 2020 18:01:59 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2234388 2234388 We discovered a coronavirus similar to the covid-19 virus 7 years ago /article/2233325-we-discovered-a-coronavirus-similar-to-the-covid-19-virus-7-years-ago/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=currents&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Wed, 12 Feb 2020 15:25:00 +0000 http://mg24532693.700 2233325