A GROWING number of supermarkets and restaurants proudly declare that the fish they sell is “sustainable” or “responsibly sourced”. This is a welcome sign that consumers are exercising their marketplace muscle to stop threatened species ending up on their plates. The trouble is that no consensus exists over what these labels mean – making it hard for consumers to distinguish genuine conservation efforts from dubious practices that hide behind ambiguous phraseology (see “Beware of ‘bluewash’: Which fish should you buy?”). The issue of declining fish stocks is too important to allow these initiatives to be undermined by specious or exaggerated…
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from ¿ìè¶ÌÊÓÆµ
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Popular articles
Trending ¿ìè¶ÌÊÓÆµ articles
1
Pancreatic cancer halted by virus injection in three patients
2
Glaciers in the 'roof of the world' have suddenly started melting
3
Does gravity create reality? A shocking path to a theory of everything
4
The best new science-fiction books of June 2026
5
Photons behave very strangely if you try to cut them
6
Mathematical AI helps researchers crack 50-year-old problem
7
Q-Day could destroy bitcoin – and our retirement savings
8
NASA plans a base on the moon spanning hundreds of square kilometres
9
How a radical new view of life could reveal its origin – and aliens
10
Aim high but don't shoot for the moon, mathematicians advise



