STARS can’t possibly have formed before the big bang, which is why astronomers have puzzled for decades over data that implies some stars are older than the Universe. “Even five years ago we had a factor of two uncertainty,” says Wendy Freeman of the Carnegie Observatories in California. Now new data from the Hubble Space Telescope has resolved the contradiction. Harvey Richer of the University of British Columbia says the measurements imply that the oldest stars formed about one billion years after the big bang, making the whole Universe just under 14 billion years old.
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from 快猫短视频
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Popular articles
Trending 快猫短视频 articles
1
Glaciers in the 'roof of the world' have suddenly started melting
2
The best new science-fiction books of June 2026
3
Does gravity create reality? A shocking path to a theory of everything
4
Why your brain needs plenty of 鈥淎ha!鈥 moments
5
How a radical new view of life could reveal its origin 鈥 and aliens
6
Pancreatic cancer halted by virus injection in three patients
7
Aim high but don't shoot for the moon, mathematicians advise
8
Embryos made without sperm or eggs reveal why many pregnancies fail
9
Mirror life: 快猫短视频s clash over threat of lab-engineered bacteria
10
Will lab-grown sperm let infertile men have children of their own?



