In Science as a Questioning Process (Institute of Physics, £20, ISBN 0
7503 0369 7), astrophysicist Nigel Sanitt puts forward a stiff new test for
scientific theories: stated simply, any theory worth the name has to answer more
questions than it raises. Using a process he calls zetetic analysis, he shows,
for instance, that Darwinism was not a proper theory, though Neo-Darwinism is.
For good measure, he crams in some reflections on the lack of certainty in
science and its close resemblance to literature.
More from ¿ìè¶ÌÊÓƵ
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Popular articles
Trending ¿ìè¶ÌÊÓƵ articles
1
The best new science-fiction books of June 2026
2
Pancreatic cancer halted by virus injection in three patients
3
Glaciers in the 'roof of the world' have suddenly started melting
4
How a radical new view of life could reveal its origin – and aliens
5
Aim high but don't shoot for the moon, mathematicians advise
6
Photons behave very strangely if you try to cut them
7
Does gravity create reality? A shocking path to a theory of everything
8
Mathematical AI helps researchers crack 50-year-old problem
9
Millions of planets might form around supermassive black holes
10
Q-Day could destroy bitcoin – and our retirement savings
