èƵ

Conspiracy theorists may not really believe their outlandish ideas

People who claim to believe in conspiracy theories may not actually deep down, which researchers uncovered by asking if they thought Canada had an elite army of genetically engineered, super intelligent, giant raccoons
An anti-lockdown protest in Trafalgar Square, London, in August 2020
An anti-lockdown protest in Trafalgar Square, London, in August 2020
Richard Baker/Getty Images

Many people who respond to surveys saying that they believe in conspiracy theories probably don’t think they are actually true. This means that attempts to assess the prevalence of these beliefs could be skewed.

Such surveys are the main way of gauging the pervasiveness of conspiracy theories, but they rarely ask respondents if their answers are sincere. Now, at Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia, and his colleagues have surveyed 1044 adults from around the country, who they contacted via the market research company YouGov.

The respondents, who had an average age of 48, were asked to rate their endorsement of seven conspiracy theories, marking them as either “definitely false”, “probably false”, “don’t know”, “probably true” or “definitely true”. These included “the idea of man-made global warming is a hoax that was invented to deceive people” and “governments are covering up the fact that 5G mobile networks spread coronavirus”.

Initially, 349 of the participants were considered to be conspiracy theorists because they said they believed at least one of these statements was probably or definitely true. The team then used two methods to gauge if they were being sincere.

Firstly, one of the seven conspiracy theories was “farcically bizarre”, says Ross, and invented by the team: “The Canadian Armed Forces have been secretly developing an elite army of genetically engineered, super intelligent, giant raccoons to invade nearby countries.”

If a participant said this was probably or definitely true, they were considered an “insincere responder”.

For the second method, the researchers asked the participants at the end of the survey if they had answered any of the questions “randomly or insincerely”. If they answered “yes”, then they were also marked as an insincere responder. Overall, 205 of the participants were marked as being insincere.

“Interestingly, our question about giant raccoons was much more effective for identifying insincere responders than our direct question about responding insincerely, which, perhaps unsurprisingly, suggests trolls don’t tend to admit to trolling,” says Ross.

at Massey University in New Zealand says many factors can affect how a person responds to surveys, such as not giving them their proper attention, a desire to affect the accuracy of the results and a lack of time. “Survey researchers need to remember that surveys are far from a perfect reflection into what’s really going on inside people’s minds,” he says.

Reference:

PsyArXiv

Topics: Mind