
IMAGINE jumping into a swimming pool. It’s cold, right? But then, a few minutes later, you are used to the temperature. Or how about walking into a room filled with cigarette smoke. It stinks, but give it a while and you don’t notice it any more.
This is habituation – the brain’s ability to stop paying attention to certain things. It doesn’t only apply to sensory perceptions. It is also why new clothes or a new home lose their shine over time. And it doesn’t only apply to good things: it can explain why people stay in bad relationships, why we don’t raise an eyebrow at the fact that most CEOs are male and why we stop noticing the smog engulfing our cities.
Advertisement
Habituation is a fundamental neurological process vital to our evolution, helping us to quickly adapt to our environments so we are ready for the stuff that is new and potentially beneficial or the hazards that may be threatening. But there are benefits to seeing the things we are used to in a fresh light or – as and put it in their book Look Again: The power of noticing what was always there – “dishabituating”.
Sharot, a professor of cognitive neuroscience at University College London, tells żěè¶ĚĘÓƵ why learning how to dishabituate can improve our happiness, increase our awareness of misinformation and even help us fight climate change.
Alison Flood: Why have we evolved a brain that habituates?
Tali Sharot: The brain cares about what is new, rather than what has always been there. It makes evolutionary sense to stop responding to things that have always been there or that are changing very gradually, so you can be ready for the next thing that is coming. But like anything in evolution, those things that may be good for us on average can also have a negative effect.
In the book, you talk about how we can become habituated to being lied to – and to misinformation. Tell me more about that.
There’s a well-known effect in psychology called the illusory truth effect, which is basically that when you hear something more than once, you’re more likely to believe it. One of the reasons for this is that when the brain encounters anything again, it responds to it less. The first time you hear a piece of information, you’re really processing it – say, “a shrimp’s heart is in its head”. When you hear it for the first time, you’re really thinking about the sentence, you’re imagining the heart in the head. But the second time I say it, your brain doesn’t have to process it any more and so it’s not responding to it. It is familiar, and we are accustomed to the idea that if something is familiar, it is probably true.
We usually have a surprise signal in our brain that indicates something is not true. But if that surprise signal is reduced or eliminated, and it could be only because we’ve heard something more than once, then we are not attuned to look at things carefully and be suspicious of their validity.

Can you become habituated to your own lying, if you do it a lot?
I was part of a team that published , where we showed that when people get the opportunity to lie at the expense of another person for their own gain, they start with really little lies. But over time, they get used to this, and then they lie more and more. While they were doing this, we recorded their brain activity. At the beginning, when they lied, there was a strong response in the amygdala, the part of the brain that is important for emotional reactions. We know that people think lying is bad, so it makes sense that people feel bad when they lie. They have this strong emotional negative reaction.
But the amygdala habituates over time in response to the same stimuli. It’s emotional habituation. So the next time people lied, there was less of a response, and so on. Usually one of the reasons we don’t lie is we feel bad about it, but the more you do it, the less bad you feel.
Is social media habituating us to images of terrible things, like war?
I believe it is, which is concerning. Social media has also completely changed what we perceive as acceptable discourse. This is a problem that needs to be solved at a higher level, involving regulations and changes to the structure of the platforms, not at an individual level.
Do we also get used to pollution because of habituation?
The most fundamental examples of habituation are to perceptual things, like what we see, what we hear, what we feel. There’s a great study in which with different levels of smog and they were asked to say whether the photos were smoggy or not. What they found is that people who lived in Los Angeles, one of the most polluted areas in the US, were much less likely to be able to detect the smog, versus people who lived in places with fresh air, like Wyoming. This is also a problem in detecting the consequences of climate change, because climate change is so slow that people get used to it.
Is it possible to overcome habituation?
You can dishabituate yourself by taking yourself out of an environment, because when you come back you’re going to see it with fresh eyes, whether it’s a few days away from home, making changes to your routine, trying a new skill. I have begun taking courses in a field different from my own. I work on different projects in different industries and on different topics. By diversifying your life, you are more likely to dishabituate, which means learning new things, but also seeing the things that are already there in a new way. Basically, any breaks that we have from people, from environments, will cause us to dishabituate.
So even small breaks can help?
It’s very counterintuitive in some ways, because when you’re having fun, you don’t want to have breaks. But in , researchers asked people if they wanted to listen to a whole song from start to finish with no interruptions, or with interruptions. Almost everyone said: “I don’t want interruptions.” But then the people with the breaks ended up enjoying the song more. That’s not something we would intuitively predict. But with anything that’s good, it’s really good in the beginning and then the joy dwindles because we habituate. But if you take a break and then you go back, now the joy is high again.
On a similar note, having shorter vacations may be better than having one long vacation. We found that . From then on, it just starts going down.

How can we stop ourselves from being habituated to something huge like air pollution or climate change?
This is a difficult one because there are things that you could do in the short term, like it might be interesting to put some clean air chambers around town, where you go into the chamber and then when you come out, you’re dishabituated to the air quality and you’re able to perceive the smog. However, I think that by realising we cannot perceive climate change, it should really make us rely on the data, right? Our feelings can deceive us. And so we need to go with the measurements and what they’re telling us.
Talking of measurements, you write that women’s self-reported happiness has actually gone down as gains have been made in terms of equal rights. How does habituation come into this?
In the 50s and 60s, before the women’s rights movement really accomplished many gains, and self-confidence than women there do now. That’s surprising because it seems that as we gain equality, we are actually becoming less happy. This is partly a matter of habituation and how it affects our expectations. Back then, women had become habituated to the status quo: they would not expect to get high-level jobs, they didn’t expect to have their own wealth. Nowadays, we do expect that, and we’re told that we can do it. But, of course, that’s not quite true because there’s a lot of hurdles.
So we think we should get as good a job as our male colleague, but we don’t actually achieve that. And that then creates what we call a negative prediction error in neuroscience – basically the difference between what you expect and what the outcome is. When the outcome is not as good as the expectation, there is a negative prediction error, and these are correlated with negative mood. But negative mood is not necessarily a bad thing. It indicates that reality is not as good as I expect it to be. And so I need to act, I need to change it.
We are living in a world full of bias and discrimination. How do we dishabituate so that there can be change?
Say, for example, you go on a plane and the pilot is male. That’s not surprising because we often see that pilots are male. So there’s no prediction error, we don’t react. And not only do we not react, our brain automatically infers why the situation is as it is – that males are probably better at navigating large equipment. And because we infer this thing that is not necessarily true, we then use those inferences to make decisions that can make things worse. For example, we’re hiring pilots and, because of this inference, we’ll be more likely to go with a male.
The solution here is to make those discrepancies salient and to show how they are not rational. There is a professor at Princeton University called . She lists all the conferences in the neuroscience field and next to each is the name of the organisers, how many female and male speakers are at the conference and what the ratio is of males and females in that specific field.
So say there’s a conference on computational psychiatry and the ratio is 60:40 in the population of people who do this, but then in the conference it is eight males and two females. That suggests the conference ratio is not quite right and that makes it very salient, and it also has accountability because there’s the name of the organisers. No one wants to be associated with such discrimination. And so people are then motivated not to have this happen.
Niv sounds like what you describe as a “dishabituation entrepreneur”. Are some people less likely to habituate than others?
It’s definitely a scale. What’s interesting is that it has been found that . If you’re slower to habituate, you’re more attentive, your brain responds to more sounds, more images, to more bits of information. And those individuals are the ones who tend to have more creative outputs.
Can just being aware of the fact we habituate make a difference?
Yes it can – and I hope it motivates people to try new things and take more chances, big and small.
Alison Flood is comment and culture editor at żěè¶ĚĘÓƵ