èƵ

Hollywood strike ends – but actors’ battle against AI may not be over

The longest actors’ strike in Hollywood history ended with an agreement that requires studios to get consent and pay performers for using AI-created digital replicas – but AI could still drastically change the industry
After months of actors striking and picketing, they have come to an agreement with Hollywood studios
Shutterstock / lev radin

Artificial intelligence has made its way into Hollywood and it may be here to stay. The use of AI to create digital likenesses was a major sticking point in the longest ever actors’ strike in history, which has ended with a tentative agreement that provides protections regarding how studios and streaming companies use performers’ digital twins. This means Hollywood can get back to work, but it may have also opened a new can of worms.

The collective bargaining agreement for performers requires film and TV companies to ask permission to make digital replicas of actors using AI or other technologies, along with providing compensation, said , chief negotiator for the Screen Actors Guild and the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA), in a interview. That same agreement also provides for a minimum wage increase and allows performers to potentially share more of the revenue from streaming platforms.

“Although an actor’s likeness has traditionally been protected through privacy and publicity rights, the chief negotiator’s statements suggest that the new provisions will provide even greater protections and protect performers from being forced into disadvantageous contracts relating to AI,” says  at US law firm Dorsey & Whitney LLP.

He says such protections would presumably also extend beyond the visual likenesses of actors to their voices and any “derivatives” of their likenesses. SAG-AFTRA and the end of its almost four-month-long strike on 8 November.

Studios would also need to seek permission from the estates, heirs or beneficiaries of deceased performers and provide compensation before using their digital likenesses. Such safeguards would “prevent a lot of people’s worst-case scenarios about AI and film,” says  at Georgia State University in Atlanta.

She says that having an agreement on AI protections that covers SAG-AFTRA’s 160,000 members ensures that actors who aren’t at Scarlett Johansson or Cillian Murphy levels of fame and fortune can still have a minimum “floor of protection”, even if they don’t have the power to negotiate with studios themselves.

But Fortmueller wants to know whether the new agreement’s baseline protection applies to background performers who appear in film and TV scenes without speaking roles – or if studios can still ask background actors to sign away their digital likeness forever in exchange for a modest sum. The exact details of the agreement are set to be released once SAG-AFTRA’s national board reviews it.

The agreement may also open new opportunities by paving the way for actors to get paid while fulfilling multiple roles simultaneously, if they agree to the use of their digital twins, says Meyer. He also said it may provide backup options in case an actor becomes unavailable before the end of a film or TV production, and it could reduce the need for re-shoots.

On the other hand, the ongoing development of new AI capabilities could bring surprises for both actors and studios down the line. It remains to be seen whether this latest SAG-AFTRA agreement will hold up well in the face of the rapid improvements in AI, says Meyer.

Expanding the use of digital actors could also limit opportunities for living performers, even if actors and their estates are compensated and credited for usage of their digital likenesses. “It will be interesting to see whether the new agreement protects living actors from having to compete with virtual versions of living and deceased actors,” says Meyer.

Actors haven’t been the only creative professionals negotiating on the use of AI. The Writers Guild of America, which represents film and TV writers, also negotiated for guaranteed protections against AI infringing on their work in a with studios and streaming companies – but only after organising the second-longest writers’ strike in the union’s history.

Now that production can continue on TV and film projects, actors may be breathing a sigh of relief. But it remains to be seen whether performers who agree to have their likeness recreated by AI will benefit in the long-term.

Topics: Artificial intelligence / Film / Machine learning