Russian forces have in Ukraine, and reports of have led to concerns about the release of radioactive material from the plant, which experienced a catastrophic meltdown in 1986. But physicists say the risk of radioactive emissions as a result of accidental damage is minimal.
Nika Melkozerova, a journalist with NewVoiceUkraine, that Russian forces have reached Chernobyl where they have met 鈥渇ierce resistance鈥� from Ukrainian soldiers. A researcher who monitors the ongoing emission of neutrons from the reactor to gauge safety spoke to 快猫短视频 on 24 February, and says that staff at Chernobyl were safe. 鈥淭he entrance of [Chernobyl is] controlled by Russians. They do not enter inside,鈥� he says.
Ukraine鈥檚 Ministry of Foreign Affairs that Russia鈥檚 actions could 鈥渃ause another ecological disaster鈥�, while the Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy 鈥淥ur defenders are giving their lives so that the tragedy of 1986 will not be repeated.鈥�
Advertisement
The explosion at Chernobyl in 1986 brought down walls and sealed off many rooms and corridors. Tonnes of fissile material from the interior of a reactor were strewn throughout the facility and the heat it generated melted sand from the reactor walls with concrete and steel to form lava-like and intensely radioactive substances that oozed into lower floors.
快猫短视频s monitoring the plant were already operating as a skeleton crew due to the covid-19 pandemic. One Chernobyl scientist, who worked on confinement plans at Chernobyl, told 快猫短视频 on 22 February, prior to the invasion, that monitoring work would continue and that all safety systems at the plant are working well, but that scientific data processing has been partially suspended. 鈥淲e have time,鈥� he said. 鈥淎ccording to my estimation, the rise of neutrons, if any, could be felt only in April. Only after that we may judge about actual trends 鈥� if it鈥檚 flattened or still growing.鈥�
叠耻迟听 at the University of Liverpool, UK, says the risk of nuclear material being released from the decaying reactor as a result of the conflict is low. 鈥淚 think as long as there is not a deliberate attack the risk is comparably low,鈥� he says. 鈥淚f it鈥檚 a deliberate act, you could possibly do it.鈥�
Merk believes that a brief interruption in monitoring is unlikely to cause issues. 鈥淚t鈥檚 a stabilised problem. So I think that if the scientists are not observing this for the next several months, which is in my view a reasonable timescale, I don鈥檛 think that there are really big risks. Yes, in the long term, it鈥檚 important to observe what鈥檚 going on. It鈥檚 important to have early warnings, but I think some of the some of the information may even be remotely accessible. Nothing will run away in the short term.鈥�
