èƵ

Enigmatic Planet Nine may have been seen by telescope in the 1980s

There is an ongoing debate about whether a huge "super-Earth" lurks in the far reaches of our solar system – but we may actually have observed it almost 40 years ago
A map centred on location of the Planet 9 candidate
Schlegel, Finkbeiner and Davis (1998)

Evidence for a massive planet in the outer solar system has been found, which may be the elusive Planet Nine that astronomers have long sought.

Planet Nine is a hypothesised world orbiting far beyond Neptune, in our solar system’s outer reaches. The gravitational clustering of some objects in the outer solar system suggests the presence of such a world, a super-Earth at least five times as massive as our planet, but no concrete evidence for it has yet been found.

at Imperial College London examined data from a now-defunct space telescope called the Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) to look for Planet Nine. Launched in 1983 and operating for nine months, the telescope surveyed the sky in infrared, discovering objects such as asteroids and comets.

Going back through the telescope’s data, Rowan-Robinson looked for evidence of a previously overlooked object orbiting at the proposed distance of Planet Nine, and one candidate stood out. IRAS detected evidence for an object three to five times the mass of Earth, orbiting about 225 times further from the sun than Earth does, roughly in Planet Nine’s expected location. “It’s very tantalising,” he says.

The limitations of the telescope, however, mean there is quite a bit of uncertainty about whether it is really a planet or not. In particular, the candidate is close to our galactic plane – that is, the thick disc of our galaxy that is full of stars, and some of these might appear deceptively planet-like in a small data set. “But in the data, it does behave quite like a moving object,” says Rowan-Robinson, which would suggest it was a planet rather than a distant star.

at the California Institute of Technology, one of the scientists who proposed the existence of Planet Nine in 2016, says that while the finding was interesting, he couldn’t be sure the candidate wasn’t a false positive. “This paper was great and I’m really glad he did this analysis,” says Brown. But the uncertainties in the data resulting from the proximity to the galactic plane meant it was “hard to pull out signals from all this dust”.

Even if the candidate did turn out to be a planet, it doesn’t quite fit the expected parameters of Planet Nine. “It’s a little too small, it’s a little too close and it’s quite a bit too inclined to the plane of the solar system,” says Brown. “It can’t cause those gravitational perturbations that we’re seeing. It’s not doing what we think is happening.”

Discover the best country to gaze at the stars:Chile: The world capital of astronomy

Nonetheless, at the University of Regina in Canada says it is worth having a look at the expected location of this candidate planet, to see if it is really there. “It’s a specific prediction for a spot on the sky where there could be something very interesting,” she says. “Someone should go observe that spot for sure.”

As to whether this candidate world and Planet Nine could both exist, Rowan-Robinson says that is unlikely. “If this object is real and it is not [Planet Nine], then it is a really remarkable coincidence,” he says.

Reference:

Sign up to Lost in Space-Time, a free monthly newsletter on the weirdness of reality

Topics: Solar system