èƵ

Why people in the UK may need to view the Neowise comet in the nude

Feedback is our weekly column of bizarre stories, implausible advertising claims, confusing instructions and more

The Great Bare

With so much unpleasantness at ground level in recent months, it is hardly surprising that people around the world have sought solace in the heavens.

Particularly widespread hay was made of the recent arrival of Neowise, a comet that was first spotted in March and is now making its closest approach to the sun. C/2020 F3 (NEOWISE), as the giant iceball is properly known, has a 6800-year orbit, meaning that this approach may well be the last time any of us gets to see it. We aren’t talking about any one person, obviously, but the human race as a whole.

Sigh. Of all the times to drop by, it had to pick the days of covid-19. Not really looking our best, are we? Feedback in particular hasn’t had a haircut since late 2019. We have had to attach our fringe to the backs of our ears with bulldog clips so that we can still see the computer screen.

By some standards, though, that’s practically overdressed for the occasion. According to a (since corrected) article in the Metro online, Neowise “has been spotted streaking across the night skies around the world and will be visible to the naked here in the UK”.

Feedback correspondent Dominic Driver, who sent the clipping in, confesses to being “somewhat surprised by the requirement to strip off to view the comet and wondering why it is only a requirement in the UK. Perhaps something to do with social distancing?”

Good thought, Dominic. We would certainly advise keeping well away from any astronomers who are wandering the countryside in the altogether.

Space names

On the subject of space, Feedback was over the moon to receive Alan Ashton’s correspondence on the contrived acronyms used in much astronomical research. Not only does he agree with our fundamental point, he provides some very compelling receipts on the subject.

“One project,” writes Alan, “is H0LiCOW. This stands for ‘H0 Lenses in COSMOGRAIL’s Wellspring’ where COSMOGRAIL refers to ‘COSmological MOnitoring of GRAvItational Lenses’. They are hoping to reconcile the results from H0LiCOW with SH0ES, ‘Supernova, H0, for the Equation of State of dark energy’.” All of which is wonderfully ARSE (AcRonym abuSE) about FACE (Frankly Absurd and self-indulgent aCronym crEation).

Alan goes on to tickle Feedback’s fancy by suggesting the coinage of a neologism. “Astronomers seem to have cornered the market in bizarre acronyms. Maybe they should be called Astronyms.” We love it.

Some certainty

In yet another entry in this week’s “Previously on Feedback” sequence, reader Bob Mays wrote to us some time ago to object to our use of the expression “more than probable”, and requested a reference table in which he could determine the exact probability referred to. We humbly prostrated ourselves before him and ceded his point.

But now, it seems that we may have ceded our ground too swiftly. Permit us, then, to quickly clamber back up onto the moral high ground and pretend we never left it in the first place. Sami Wannell has written in to direct us – and we quote – “to Sherman Kent’s work with NATO around how people interpret different ‘estimative probability’ terms”.

shows that people consider “unlikely” to be more likely then “little chance”, but less likely than “improbable” – which, in turn, is seen as less likely than “likely” and even more unlikely than “probable”.

What’s more, the study reveals that “probable” is seen as less likely than “very good chance”, “highly likely” and “almost certainly”. Which means, Bob, that our posteriors are very amply covered. Profuse thanks to Sami, who – in classic Feedback fashion – points out that his surname is pronounced one-L but spelled with two.

Rhea sighting

At some point in the fairly recent past (the months, where do they go? Answers on a sterilised postcard), Feedback returned to the subject of unusual social-distancing yardsticks.

We focused in particular on an Australian airport that suggested staying one cassowary apart, a whimsical idea on which we riffed airily, pointing out that the cassowary’s famously dangerous claws may warrant staying at least one cassowary apart from any cassowary.

Another flightless bird has made headlines since then, this time on the other side of the world. The scene is Brazil, and the protagonist is a noble rhea that took it upon itself to stroll around the grounds of the presidential palace.

The villain of the affair? Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro, who foolishly violated social-distancing protocols by trying to feed the bird. The result? A pecking that – from a photographic point of view, at least – looks pretty painful indeed.

With Bolsonaro’s popularity on the wane in Brazil, not everybody was immediately sympathetic. , Margarida Salomão, a member of congress for the Workers’ Party, was particularly scathing. “This rhea represents us,” she tweeted. Duly noted.

You can send stories to Feedback by email at feedback@newscientist.com. Please include your home address. This week’s and past Feedbacks can be seen on our website.

Got a story for Feedback?
Send it to feedback@newscientist.com or èƵ, 25 Bedford Street, London WC2E 9ES
Consideration of items sent in the post will be delayed

More from èƵ

Explore the latest news, articles and features