èƵ

‘Zombie’ fires are burning the Arctic after smouldering under snow

Unprecedented Arctic fires from last summer appear to have smouldered in the underground peat of the tundra through winter and reignited this month as snow melted
Satellite images show that last year’s Arctic fires have reignited after smouldering all winter
Sentinel Hub / Processed by Pierre Markuse

There is strong evidence that last summer’s unprecedented Arctic blazes appear to have smouldered through winter as “zombie fires” and reignited this month.

Intense blazes across the frozen north last year led to record carbon emissions that were on a par with those from Belgium, exacerbating the global warming that made the conditions for the fires possible in the first place.

Now as temperatures rise in the region and snow recedes, satellite analysis of last year’s burn sites and the fires erupting this month suggest many in Siberia may be zombie fires.

“We know they are real and quite rare. That’s why seeing so many potential spots in Siberia is interesting. The satellite images are astonishing, particularly the snowmelt immediately followed by the fires appearing,” says Thomas Smith at the London School of Economics.

In an analysis for èƵ based on imagery from the European Space Agency’s Sentinel-2 satellites, Smith identified 2019 burn scars and 2020 hotspots and found overlap of fires from last July and fires that appeared immediately after snowmelt this year. This includes known peatlands in tundra north of the boreal forest, where peat below ground could smoulder through winter. “I think there is some strong evidence for zombie fires,” he says.

The tentative signs of this come as said fire managers in Alaska have found such fires occurring more frequently in the past two decades. Significantly, given 2019’s record-breaking blazes, they found zombie fires are more likely to occur the year after a large fire year. The new blazes usually re-emerge within 50 days of snow melting, they added.

If more fires are surviving winter, that is bad news for climate change, says Smith. “The implication is greater net carbon emissions, given that overwintering fires, by their nature, are smouldering soil and peat fires, burning through long-term carbon stores.”

Mark Parrington at the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts in the UK echoes the risk of a knock-on effect. “If these are zombie fires and they are quite widespread in areas that were burning last summer, then, under the right environmental conditions, there may be a cumulative effect of the previous fire season feeding into this coming season and leading to large-scale and long-term fires across the region again,” he says.

Without reports from the ground, Smith says we can’t know for certain if they are zombie fires or new ones lit by people as snow melted. But he says: “The fires seem so widespread and so sudden that I find it hard to believe that humans could have been everywhere at once in such a sparsely populated place.” Another reason to think they are zombie fires is that the ignition appears in spots, rather than the lines or perimeters that are more likely if people are starting the blazes, he adds.

Nonetheless, Anton Beneslavskiy at Greenpeace in Russia thinks intentional burning by people is more likely to be the cause in Siberia, noting past surveys have shown most fires start near roads and logging sites. While he says zombie fires are possible, he adds: “There is no clear evidence they were the reason for the fires of the last week.”

One way to mitigate against zombie fires is more monitoring on the ground and extinguishing them in winter, says Jessica McCarty at Miami University in Florida. “Most zombie fires in Alaska have been caught because hunters or snowmobilers report the locations to the Alaska Forest Service. Without that in-situ info, we would never find them with satellite data, as they are often still partially covered in snow.”

Topics: Climate change / Fire / Forest fires / the Arctic