èƵ

Coronavirus: Developing countries are ‘on a ledge with no safety net’

David Miliband, head of the International Rescue Committee, says the world's richest countries still have time to help protect the most fragile countries from the spread of covid-19
David Miliband (right) visits Yemen, one of the world’s most at-risk countries
Kellie Ryan/IRC

The world’s richest countries are guilty of a myopic international response to the coronavirus crisis that will hurt the world’s poorest people and the global fight against the disease, warns David Miliband, CEO of the US-based International Rescue Committee (IRC).

Miliband, a former UK politician and foreign secretary, says there is still time to stop human suffering in the world’s most fragile countries, by increasing handwashing, fever testing and building isolation centres.

A report by the IRC estimates that in a worst-case scenario, more than 3 million people will die from covid-19 and a billion would be infected across 34 crisis-affected countries.

The estimates, based on modelling done by Imperial College London, are likely to be conservative because they assume levels of healthcare that match those in China, which many of the countries don’t have, says Miliband.

Three of the countries most at risk are Yemen, which already has the world’s worst humanitarian crisis, Nigeria, because it has the largest population in Africa, and Bangladesh, which is home to the biggest refugee camp, he says.

Sub-Saharan Africa is puzzling, Miliband says, because although little covid-19 testing has taken place in the region, health facilities run by the IRC there haven’t been overrun. That could be due to a younger population in the region. “Demography might be playing a part, but it might not. More likely is that the spread of the disease has not yet hit the full ramp-up, partly because many of the places we work are not as integrated into the global economy as New York or London.”

The coming weeks will be critical, he says. On 4 May, Nigeria confirmed its highest daily number of covid-19 cases on the day it began to phase out lockdown measures.

“Obviously, it’s very worrying if countries like Nigeria start relaxing their lockdowns at precisely the time when the disease might be spreading most strongly,” says Miliband.

In many places in the world, he says, people are on an economic ledge without a safety net. “The danger is if the health emergency doesn’t get you, the economic and social emergency does. The lesson of this crisis is we have to fill the hole. Universal healthcare has to go from a World Health Organization (WHO) ambition to something governments around the world really commit to.”

Tackling the virus in the world’s most vulnerable countries isn’t just a moral argument, but a practical one of self-interest for high-income countries too, he argues: “There will be no return to anything like economic or social normality until the disease is beaten everywhere.”

However, richer governments have failed to support poorer ones with international aid on covid-19, he says.

“Up to now, governments are being understandably focused on the home front, but myopic and neglecting the international front. That myopia is damaging. Damaging to the lives of people in the countries where we work, but also to the overall fight against the disease.”

Citizens should urge leaders to heed the dangers of the inward-looking, nationalistic period after the first world war and take inspiration from the outward-looking, multilateral time after the second world war, says Miliband.

“There are plenty of ‘nationalists’ willing to say the lesson of this disease is there’s too much global connection and we should crack down on refugees and immigrants. But actually that’s not the lesson,” he says.

The IRC is about halfway to its goal of raising $30 million to help fragile countries during the pandemic. The group has had to adapt many of the other services it provides to people to avoid risk of covid-19 transmission. Education programmes, which are normally based on bringing children together, are using radio to reach people instead, for example.

Although the WHO’s actions haven’t been perfect, says Miliband, US president Donald Trump’s decision to halt US funding to the WHO while reviewing its handling of the coronavirus crisis was unhealthy and misguided. The danger is that there is a cost to the president’s review of the WHO, and “that price is paid by the most vulnerable people in the world”.

Miliband says he is “obviously very worried” that more than 30,000 people have died in the UK, the highest level in Europe.

“‘If everything is going so well, why are so many people dying?’, is the question in my mind. There are obviously very hard questions to ask about how we’ve ended up in this situation,” he says.

Topics: coronavirus / covid-19