żěè¶ĚĘÓƵ

Vampire bats practise social distancing when they feel ill

Vampire bats are social creatures that build relationships through grooming and food-sharing, but when they feel ill, they self-isolate and call out for contact far less
Vampire bats keep their distance from others when they are under the weather
Avalon/Photoshot License / Alamy

It turns out that humans aren’t the only species that practices social distancing in response to infectious diseases. Two new studies have revealed that vampire bats become socially and physically isolated from other colony members when they feel ill.

“Vampire bats are extremely social,” says Sebastian Stockmaier at the University of Texas at Austin. These bats form strong ties not only with their kin, he says, but also with other members of their colony, building relationships through grooming and food-sharing.

Stockmaier and his colleagues were interested in how these relationships might be affected by disease, so they simulated this process in captive colonies of common vampire bats (Desmodus rotundus) in Panama. They injected some bats with a component of bacterial cell walls called lipopolysaccharide (LPS) that induces an immune response, making the bats feel and act ill.

The researchers then recorded the calls that the bats make for initiating social contact and facilitating physical interactions, comparing their frequency between those who had been injected with LPS and those who hadn’t . In a separate study, the same researchers tracked grooming and food-sharing between LPS-injected bats and their colony mates.

They found that the bats that felt ill made 30 per cent fewer contact calls than their healthy-feeling counterparts. The bats that felt ill were also more physically isolated from colony members, though there were exceptions. In general, LPS-injected bats both gave and received less grooming from unrelated bats, but mothers that felt ill still groomed their offspring, who returned the favour even if they felt ill too.

These priorities make sense to Krista Patriquin at the University of Toronto Mississauga in Canada, who wasn’t involved in this research.

“If you’re going to help anybody, you’re going to help your own offspring, and the risks of not helping them maybe outweigh the risks of potentially getting them sick,” she says.

The researchers didn’t find any effect of illness on food-sharing, possibly because it is so immediately essential for survival, says Stockmaier.

While the bats’ social distancing could possibly limit a pathogen’s spread, Stockmaier doesn’t think these isolating behaviours have evolved to protect other bats. Instead, he says they may be a consequence of the bats’ malaise and lethargy from feeling ill.

Aside from humans, self-isolation for group survival has only been documented in colonial insects, such as ants, says Stockmaier. But other animals will distance themselves from ill individuals to save their own hides. Frog tadpoles avoid those infected with a pathogenic fungus, and mandrill monkeys can sniff out and avoid group members harbouring parasites.

Patriquin is curious about the lasting effects of bats that had withdrawn while ill on their social network. After all, bats don’t have videoconferencing tools for remote upkeep of relationships.

“Is [the bat] maybe not going to get [groomed by others] as much, or is it not going to get fed as much after it’s been away for a bit?,” she says.

Going forward, Stockmaier wants to investigate how the pathogens in naturally occurring infections, such as rabies or Bartonella, might impact bat social behaviour.

“Maybe [the pathogens] wouldn’t decrease social interactions, or even increase them to favour their transmission,” he says.

BioRxiv

Journal of Animal Ecology

Topics: Animals / Disease