èƵ

We need to talk about technology that people use to influence others

Multi-agent artificial intelligence simulations could show us how to help people live in harmony – or how to stoke anti-immigrant sentiment. We must agree rules for its use
City simulations
City simulations imagine almost anything
Getty Images

“ARE we the baddies?” That punchline from a Mitchell and Webb comedy sketch about two Nazi soldiers is something that scientists ought to askthemselves more frequently. Even ifthe knowledge that people create is neutral, its applications often aren’t.

The potential for misuse often goes unnoticed until it is too late. Consider a Facebook app called This Is Your Digital Life, which gathered information about users’ personalities. What looked like an innocuous, even fun, research project was later used by Cambridge Analytica toharvest personal data and manipulate people’s exposure to political messaging without their knowledge or consent.

Even though the effectiveness of Cambridge Analytica’s manipulations has been questioned, this demonstrates how well-intentioned research can behijacked by bad actors.

This is why the pre-emptive steps being taken by the scientists developing a technology called multi-agent artificial intelligence (MAAI) are praiseworthy. Simulations that use MAAI allow computer scientists to build detailed digital models of human societies and see how decisions would play out in thereal world (see “AI can predict your future behaviour with powerful new simulations”).

Although the technology has immense potential for good – for example, it is already being used to find ways to peacefully integrate refugees into Western societies – it has equal potential for bad. Politicians could useitto do the exact opposite: stoking anti-immigrant sentiment and violence for political advantage.

The developers of MAAI are aware ofthe potential for misuse – they actually use the word “evil” – and are drawing up a code of conduct to prevent misuse. But self-policing can get us only so far; the temptation to bend the rules will prove irresistible to somebody.

What we need is robust debate aboutthe technology and how it shouldand shouldn’t be used. Looking atUK and USpolitics at the moment, however, it isn’t hard to suspect that it may already be too late to prevent good science frombeing misused.

Topics: Archaeology / Genetics / human evolution / humans