èƵ

A road made of solar panels seemed like a good idea. Now it’s broken

Feedback is our weekly column of bizarre stories, implausible advertising claims, confusing instructions and more

Sunset boulevard

Almost three years after it opened, the world’s first solar roadway has been labelled a disaster. Engineers announced that the 1-kilometre-long Wattway in Tourouvre-au-Perche, north-west France, was crumbling due to traffic and the effects of weathering. To make matters worse, the 3000 square metres of photovoltaic cells spent so much time covered in leaves that they only produced half the expected energy.

It is difficult to find a positive spin on a road that can’t be travelled, made of solar panels that don’t work. Yet this is unlikely to dent the allure of solar farms that double as highways. The premise is that two things that are good in their own right would be even better if combined. This logic holds true for peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, but less so for climate change, say, or root canals.

The €5 million Wattway – or, to give it its full name, the Wattawaste of money – never struck Feedback as a particularly sound investment. At its inauguration, the former French energy minister proposed that 1000 kilometres of solar roadways would be built in the next five years. But even that impressive figure would only amount to 600 hectares of solar panels. By comparison, a single conventional farm, Cestas Solar Park in Bordeaux, covers 250 hectares.

That’s a shame, really, because the concept is such an elegant way of making use of an otherwise wasted resource. As an alternative, substituting the ever-beating rays of the sun for the liberal circulation of hot air, might we suggest a wind farm in London’s Parliament Square?

Oh the humanity!

Approximately 500 hours of video are uploaded to YouTube every minute, too much #content for mere human eyes to monitor. That is where AI comes in: machines capable of distinguishing violent and graphic content from your cousin’s make-up tutorial or baffling list ofegg-based lifehacks. Last week, hobbyists and engineers discovered that the AI in charge of YouTube’s moderation was consistently removing videos of robot battles, labelling them as “animal cruelty”. A spokesperson promised that the error would soon be resolved and the videos reinstated. Feedback thinks that when the robot revolution arrives, we can’t say we weren’t warned.

Easy rider

We all know that cycling to work is a good way to reduce your carbon footprint. So Feedback was intrigued to hear that British architect Neil Campbell had broken the cycling speed record when he “reached more than 174mph” on a specially constructed bicycle, according to BBC News.

That’s certainly one way to reduce your time spent commuting, though the speeding fines may not be worth it. Yet we were struck by a small detail: among the bicycle’s special adaptations was a coupling that hooked it to a Porsche Cayenne sports utility vehicle. After being towed up to speed, Campbell was released to fly through the timing gate “under his own power”.

As cycling records go, those four words may be doing more work than the person in the saddle, but it does raise an interesting question. Might we say Neil Armstrong walked to the moon, having been accelerated by a Saturn V rocket before stepping onto the regolith under his own power? The next time someone chides you about the environmental impact of flying to Barbados for your holiday, Feedback suggests you reassure them: I walked all the way. The aeroplane simply stopped me falling down.

Know thy shelf

Browsing the catalogue of building merchants Wickes, Peter Oakley has discovered a truly phenomenal piece of home improvement paraphernalia.

The Duraline White Lacquered Floating Shelf is reportedly “100% invisible when attached to the wall”. To be honest, this seems like quite an inconvenient quality for something hard that sticks out of a wall – although holiday tchotchkes will probably look impressive as they float in space, defying the forces of gravity and good taste.

Speaking of space, Peter notes the shelf’s impressive depth: “235Mm”, or 235,000 kilometres, “which would simplify getting to the moon and back, and for £11”. Quite a bargain, we agree. But once you had installed those thousands of kilometres of shelving, how would you ever get any of your beloved knick-knacks down?

King’s ransom

Previously, Feedback mused on the mortality rates for different chess pieces in battle (17 August). David Shaw takes issue with our claim that all non-drawn games end with one king’s demise. “The king is never captured,” he says. The game is won when one player’s king is in check and they have no way to remove the threat.

He isn’t wrong – clearly a rook-y error on our part. Though it does make us wonder, what happens after checkmate? And why are we, as omniscient observers, not party to it? For such profoundly spiritual questions, we suggest you consult your closest bishop.


Got a story for Feedback?
Send it to èƵ, 25 Bedford Street, London WC2E 9ES or you can email us at feedback@newscientist.com

Article amended on 21 October 2019

We corrected the end-game in chess.

More from èƵ

Explore the latest news, articles and features