
An oversight in historical weather records means we have underestimated how much the climate warmed lastcentury. The finding means we are 0.1°C closer to passing the internationally-agreed limit of 2°C than we thought.
“Global warming has been stronger than we think,” says Rasmus Benestad of the Norwegian Meteorological Institute in Oslo, who led the analysis.
The problem stems from around the world. “At the start of the temperature records, you have most measurements from Europe and North America, and also along the trade routes,” says Benestad. “The area that was covered was about 20 per cent of the Earth’s area.”
Advertisement
This has been a favourite theme of climate deniers, some of whom have argued that the temperature record is too incomplete to be reliable. But in fact temperatures tend to be similar across regions.
“If you have a warm winter in Britain, you tend to have a warm winter in most of Europe,” says Benestad. As a result, climatologists have largely been able to fill in the gaps in the early record, and there is a high degree of confidence that the Earth has warmed due to greenhouse gas emissions.
However, Benestad and his colleagues found a subtler problem. The early weather stations were all in regions where the temperature does not vary too much from month to month. Only in later decades were stations built in places like Siberia, where month-to-month changes are larger.
To find out if this was a problem, Benestad’s team ran computer models of the global climate for 1861 to 2017, and noted how the simulated global average temperature changed. Then they calculated the global average again, this time limiting the models to only use data corresponding to the weather stations that were present in each year.
They found that choices of early weather stations did create a problem. The older temperature records came out slightly too warm, while more recent ones were slightly too cold. The net result was that the warming between 1881-1910 and 1986-2015 had been underestimated by 0.1°C.
The upshot is that the “safe space” in which we can keep burning fossil fuels is smaller than we thought.
Journal reference:Geophysical Research Letters,