
Bunnies with floppy ears might look cuter than normal rabbits but they suffer more health problems, a study has found.
“People now need to weigh up whether those cute floppy ears are worth the risk of pain, deafness, and difficulty eating for the rabbit, not to mention the extra vet bills,” says Charlotte Burn at the Royal Veterinary College in the UK, who led the study.
The mutations that make don’t just affect the ears, say Burn. They alter the shape of the skull, making the animals more prone to a variety of problems.
Advertisement
At least, that what vets would tell you, says Burn. But no one had actually done a proper study to establish this. So her team went to a rabbit rescue centre and compared 15 lop-eared rabbits with 15 normal ones. They looked for signs of pain or irritation such as ear scratching, examined the rabbits’ ears and mouths, and looked at their medical records.
Bad teeth
They found the lop-eared rabbits were much more likely to have ear or dental problems that cause pain or difficulty eating, such as narrowed ear canals and misaligned incisors. “The effect size is enormous,” says Burn.
In fact, they often had such narrow ear canals that it was difficult to insert an otoscope, says team member Jade Johnson, and some examinations had to be cut short because the animals were clearly in pain.
So although the number of animals in the study was small, Burn thinks it very likely that the findings apply to all pet rabbits.
She hopes the findings will make people think twice before buying lop-eared rabbits, which now account for over half the rabbits sold in the UK.
Read more: Taming of the bunny rewrote rabbit genome
Yet, despite recent publicity about short-muzzled dogs like pugs and bulldogs being more prone to many disorders and often suffering greatly as a result of their abnormal skulls, these breeds are still becoming more popular. In fact, , with pugs in third place, according to one pet company.
“It’s not translating into actual behaviour,” Burn says. “These are still very fashionable dogs.”
Reference: bioRxiv