èƵ

Intel’s quest to build the world’s first true quantum computer

James Clarke, of Intel’s quantum computing research team, tells èƵ about his ambitions to make the first device with a million qubits
A person holding up a chip
Intel’s James Clarke with a 17-qubit superconducting quantum chip
Shawn Morgan/Intel Corporation

Intel is taking a slow and steady approach to quantum computing. Competitors like Google may be racing to achieve so-called quantum supremacy, in which a quantum computer outperforms an ordinary one. But Intel’s James Clarke has bigger ideas. He leads the firm’s quantum computing research team, and says it is looking past near-term goals in order to be the first to make a device with a million qubits, or quantum bits – enough to have a real impact on the world.

How are you making a quantum computer?
We have spin qubits in silicon, which are like single electron transistors. We make billions of transistors today, so the thought is, if we can turn these into qubits – which is non-trivial – they would have some key [scaling] advantages over the superconducting qubit [Google’s preferred approach]. We aren’t putting all our eggs in one basket, and the superconducting qubits are a little further along. We have a 49-qubit chip of those.

Why go for the long term?
What do I define as long-term success? Something that would change your life or mine – maybe a new drug. For that, you need very good qubits and you need a lot of them.

What is Intel’s big goal?
Right now, the whole community is at, let’s say, tens of qubits, maybe 50. And maybe with brute force you could make a chip bigger and bigger and get to about 1000. With 1000, you can probably do some interesting things. You can probably even find a couple of applications where you are doing a little bit better than a supercomputer.

My goal would be to find a way to get a million or a billion qubits together on a chip. That keeps me up at night. At Intel, we are less worried about the answers we will get from 50 qubits and more about how we will get to a million. We want to be the first to do that.

When will that be possible?
We are saying roughly 10 years. Some of the other companies in this field are saying something much nearer term. But if you look at the history of the evolution in microelectronics, it actually happened on a little bit longer scale than that. The first silicon transistor was in 1954, the first integrated circuit was in 1958 and the first microprocessor was in 1970.

Will I use a quantum computer in my lifetime?
The Cray-1 supercomputer came out in the mid-70s. I doubt anybody then would have said, “Hey, I bet 40 years from now, we are going to have these in our back pockets for listening to music and watching television.” It is hard to know where we will be in 30 to 40 years, so I wouldn’t rule it out.

On a more practical level, the first quantum computers will be hooked up to a supercomputer. Chances are, it will take a team of experts who are familiar with programming the supercomputer and programming a quantum computer to get the information in or out. We need to develop the workforce to be able to do that. It doesn’t really exist yet. Quantum computer programmers are few and far between.

Topics: quantum computing