
Stone Age Europeans may have deliberately amputated their fingers during religious ceremonies. The controversial idea could explain why so many of the prehistoric images of hands on cave walls are missing fingers.
“Finger amputation was a reasonably common behaviour in many regions in the recent past,” says Mark Collard of Simon Fraser University in British Columbia, Canada. “The available data seem to fit reasonably well with the hypothesis that some Upper Palaeolithic people engaged in finger amputation for the purposes of religious sacrifice.”
Images of hands, whether handprints or hand stencils, are some of the most common forms of cave art. They are found on several continents.
Advertisement
Two French caves called Gargas and Cosquer are known for their unusual hand images. Gargas has 231 hand images and 114 have at least one finger segment missing, while Cosquer has 49 hand images, 28 of which are missing finger segments. “In both cases it’s a fairly high percentage,” says Collard. There are isolated examples elsewhere.
Nobody knows why. One suggestion is that the people’s hands were intact and the , just as we show “three” by folding two fingers. Alternatively, Ian Gilligan at the University of Sydney, Australia has suggested that .
Off with their fingers
Collard and his colleagues wondered if instead people might have removed the fingers on purpose. To find out if this was plausible, they examined studies of recent human societies to see how many practised finger amputation. They found 121 societies that did it.
“I was pretty shocked,” says Collard. “It seems like such a debilitating practice that I couldn’t imagine signing up to do it myself. I still can’t. Yet, we kept finding group after group that did it.”
People amputated fingers for one of ten reasons, including as a marker of group identity and as a punishment. “We decided that, based on the hand images alone, the most likely practices were mourning and sacrifice,” says Collard. In some societies people voluntarily remove a finger while mourning. In others, voluntary finger removal represents a religious sacrifice done to appeal to a supernatural being – for instance, some women remove and eat a finger to help bring on pregnancy.
Collard suspects sacrifice was the real reason for finger removal in Stone Age France. “The idea that the hand images reflect sacrifice is consistent with the way that cave art has been interpreted by many researchers over the years,” he says. It has been linked to rituals that might involve mind-altering drugs. “Cave art is often in dark, hard-to-access parts of caves, which is consistent with them being part of some sort of dysphoric ritual.”
Collard emphasises that this is a hypothesis. “It’s not a slam-dunk case, by any means,” he says. “We could easily be wrong.”
If the idea is correct, it hints at the state of society. “The images may be telling us that early modern humans in Europe were divided into tight-knit groups that engaged in intense inter-group competition,” says Collard. That’s because, according to studies of religious behaviour, unpleasant experiences can enhance cooperation within groups and lead people to distrust members of other groups.
Frozen hands
“I agree with the authors’ conclusion that the finger segments are really missing, but I am not convinced by their explanation,” says Gilligan. He still thinks frostbite is more likely.
“None of the ethnographic cases they cite match the distinctive pattern seen in the ice age hand stencils – namely, a sequential shortening of fifth, fourth and third fingers, with the thumb spared,” says Gilligan. “On the other hand, pun intended, this pattern matches precisely the effects of frostbite. The pattern corresponds to the differing susceptibility of fingers to frostbite, with the thumb not affected.”
Paul Pettitt of Durham University in the UK says there is no reason to think people’s fingers were removed at all, because they could simply have folded their fingers back. “The argument that it’s not bent fingers has usually been made on the basis that you can’t bend one or more fingers back and then create a sharp-outlined hand stencil,” he says. “If you spend half an hour learning to create these things, you can do very sharp outlines with bent fingers.”
While Pettitt agrees that some prehistoric people may have removed fingers, he argues this doesn’t explain the stencils. “Most of the ethnographic examples involve the removal of a little finger,” he says. The hand stencils in Gargas cave have up to four fingers missing. “Nobody would be idiotic enough to remove every finger bar the thumb. That simply makes no sense.”
Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology