èƵ

Feedback: We are embracing the study of embracing

Feedback is our weekly column of bizarre stories, implausible advertising claims, confusing instructions and more

octopus cartoon

Octopus’s garden

FEEDBACK is buzzing at the startling news that octopuses fed MDMA go all huggy (29 September, p 18). Cephalopods can change skin patterns, maybe to communicate (6 October, p 39). We wondered what might signal “it’s not that stuff they put in the water, I really, really love you”, but then realised that it may be impossible to differentiate that message from “let’s dance to dawn”.

It inspired us, though, to begin a search for hug-related research. We immediately found ““, in the August edition of IEEE Spectrum and about a talk by Alexis Block and Katherine Kuchenbecker of the haptic intelligence department at the Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems in Stuttgart, Germany, on ““.

“Andrew Shearman saw the rolling banner on Sky News say Donna Strickland is the first woman for 55 years to win the “Nobel Peace Prize for Physics”. As opposed to the other physics prize?”

They found that people generally welcomed the soft and warm hugs from their HuggyBot. But when it persisted for 5 seconds after they attempted to disengage, this caused “low-key panic”. Not dissimilar to some dance-floor experiences, then. We’d welcome more examples of scientists embracing the study of embracing.

Chains got a hold

THE press releases our colleagues receive are sometimes weird and wonderful. Presently prominent are those promising exciting applications of blockchain technology, best known for enabling bitcoin – despite its soaring energy consumption (4 November 2017, p 8). A recent example promises the “inspiring story of two entrepreneurs who teamed up on the soccerfield back in 1990”.

So far, so heart-warming. This one gets better. They promise “to leverage blockchain technology to drive real business decisions”. How? With a “ground-breaking Visual Workflow Designer that gives anyone the ability to craft powerful Blockchain-based solutions with no coding skills”. The goes on: “generated code is deployed, maintained and updated as blockchain specific smart contracts”.

So they have a blockchain-based solution to the problem of developing blockchain-based solutions. Suggestions for third-order solution solutions will be routed by our resident neural-network wetware filter to the cylindrical file under the desk.

Maxwell’s silver harmoniser

MORE old-fashioned pseudoscience continues, meanwhile, unabated. Galen Ives recently came across a full-page advert on the back of a magazine for “Quantogram phone and wifi harmonisers”. These are, apparently, designed to protect us from the horrors of “electronic smogs and EMFs”.

As a Feedback reader, Galen is duty-bound to research his initial scepticism. A quick look at revealed a good deal of waffle about quantum mechanics, with the priceless observation that “some Quantum Physicists are having great difficulty explaining Quantum Mechanics as the research is now going into parallel dimensions, multiple states, and other findings with which most people struggle to comprehend”.

Taking his responsibilities seriously, Galen emailed the purveyors of this waffle to ask how their Quantogram harmoniser actually works. They replied quickly, telling him: “Inside the self-adhesive Quantogram Phone Harmoniser is specific calculated mathematical equations that are embedded to effect change and provide strength and protection for the user.” Are the equations then written on parchment as a kind of talisman?

Science in the home

ANOTHER duty of Feedback readers is to spot non-obvious and possibly genuinely important connections. We reported on one of science’s unsung heroes, James Croll, the janitor who first linked ice ages to variations in Earth’s orbit (25 August, p 34). John Reid recalled that Croll did in fact get some credit, notably in Robert Ball’s 1890 book The Cause of an Ice Age (Letters, 29 September).

Penelope Stanford zoomed in on Reid’s observation that his copy of the book was presented as an English prize in a girls’ school. “Somewhere,” she writes, “probably at the end of the 19th century, a scientific work was presented as the prize… to a girl. I wonder about the teacher, presumably a woman, and the girl: which one made the choice, and what happened to the prizewinner afterwards?” We eagerly await the next instalment.

Beetle-black bloc

stealing insects cartoon

WE REPORTED the theft of creepy-crawlies valued at $40,000, including scorpions, millipedes and a six-eyed sand spider, from the (15 September). Alan Wills writes to observe that none of these arthropods that we cited as examples is actually an insect. “No wonder the ex-employees who supposedly perpetrated the theft were disgruntled,” he posits. “Doubtless they know their taxonomy better than the marketing people who dreamed up the name of the place, and simply sought to adjust the exhibition so that it actually contains what it says on the label.”

The movement for taxonomic exactitude has until now expressed its correct fury in letters to our editor. The suggestion that it has acquired a direct-action wing is disturbing.

You can send stories to Feedback by email at feedback@newscientist.com. Please include your home address. This week’s and past Feedbacks can be seen on our website.

More from èƵ

Explore the latest news, articles and features