![WDM_080[2]](/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/wdm_0802.jpg?w=840)
William De Morgan was something of a liability. He once used a fireplace as a makeshift kiln and set fire to his rented London home. And as a businessman he was a disaster. The prices he charged for his tiles and ceramics hardly even paid for the materials, never mind his time.
At the turn of the 20th century, when serious financial problems loomed, only a man of De Morgan鈥檚 impractical stripe would resort to writing fiction. But the tactic paid off. No one remembers them these days, but the autobiographical Joseph Vance (1903) and subsequent听novels were well regarded at the time, and hugely popular.
Advertisement
Sublime Symmetry at London鈥檚 Guildhall Art Gallery wants to tell the story of this polymathic artist but (like De Morgan himself, one suspects) it keeps disappearing down intellectual rabbit holes. De Morgan鈥檚 father was the freethinking mathematician Augustus De Morgan, whose student听Francis Guthrie听came up with听the four-colour hypothesis (whereby designing a map, so that countries with a common boundary are differently shaded, requires only four colours). His whimsical tiled fire surround for his friend Charles Dodgson (Lewis Carroll) might have inspired that author鈥檚 nonsense verses. Other ceramic projects included the tiles on a dozen P&O liners. Ada Lovelace was a family friend.
On and on like this, until it dawns on you that none of this is an accident, 听the show鈥檚 endless rabbit holes are its point, and fashioning a man like William de Morgan 鈥 a mathematically inventive painter of pots, for heaven鈥檚 sake 鈥 would today be an impossibility.
With all our talk of STEAM and 鈥淪ci Art鈥, the sciences and the humanities are more isolated and defended against each other (鈥渟iloed鈥 is the current term of art) than they ever were in De Morgan鈥檚 day. And the world itself, as a consequence, is a little less capable of sustaining wonder. 听
Fusion and freedom
Like Maurits听Escher, half a century later, the ceramicist De Morgan drew inspiration from natural forms, and rendered them with a rigor learned from studying classical Arabic design. This fusion of the animate and the geometrical was best expressed on plates and bowls, the best of them made, not in听a fireplace, but in the rather more sensible setting of Sand鈥檚 End Pottery in Fulham.
De Morgan鈥檚 skills as a draftsman were extraordinary. He could draw, free-hand, any pattern around a central line that would have perfect mirror symmetry. Becoming expert in lustreware, he painted his designs directly onto the ceramic surface of his pots and plates, manipulating his original sketches to fit every curve of an object.
It fits De Morgan鈥檚 somewhat disorganised reputation that lustreware should have become unfashionable by the end of the century, just as he perfected it.
Even now, it takes a few minutes鈥 wandering around the Guildhall Gallery for the visitor鈥檚 eye to accommodate itself to these objects: so very Victorian, so very hand-done and apparently quotidian. Make the time. This show is a gem, and De Morgan鈥檚 achievement is extraordinary. Among these tiles and pots and plates are some of the most natural and apparently effortless fusions of artistic proportion and mathematical rigor ever committed to any medium.
[exhibition_info title=鈥漇ublime Symmetry鈥 title_link=鈥漢ttps://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/things-to-do/visit-the-city/attractions/guildhall-galleries/Pages/sublime-symmetry.aspx鈥 gallery=鈥滸uildhall Art Gallery鈥 gallery_link=鈥漢ttps://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/things-to-do/visit-the-city/attractions/guildhall-galleries/Pages/guildhall-art-gallery.aspx鈥 location=鈥滾ondon鈥 fromdate=鈥11 May鈥 todate=鈥28 October鈥漖
听