
The UK health secretary has called on social media giants to do more to tackle sexting among the nation’s teens, which he blames for rising cases of mental illness. Yet his proposals for smart locks that aim to prevent bullying and stop teenagers sharing sexually explicit images online are just the latest example of government demanding the tech sector come up with magical fixes to complex societal problems.
Giving evidence to the House of Commons health committee as part of an inquiry into , Jeremy Hunt singled out social media as a key platform for abuse, “I ask myself the simple question as to why you can’t prevent the texting of sexually explicit images by people under the age of 18, if that’s a lock that parents choose to put on a mobile phone contract.” The health secretary added “I ask myself why we can’t identify cyberbullying when it happens on social media platforms by word pattern recognition, and then prevent it happening.”
Hunt is no stranger to magical solutions. His tech proposals are easy to suggest, but much harder to achieve in reality. Simple artificial intelligence can flag abusive keywords and recognise explicit images, but these are crude tools that often fail to understand the context of these words and images, and more importantly, are easy to circumvent.
Advertisement
Most practical filters, like those protecting the comments sections of a website, rely on feedback from thousands of viewers who can flag objectionable content. Not much use in a two-way chat dialogue – I’m guessing Hunt doesn’t want the crowd down-voting teen nudes. And similar content filters on Facebook have resulted in women having their accounts suspended for .
What is porn?
When even US Supreme Court judges have tried and failed to pin down what classifies as obscene, only concluding “,” how can we build an AI that recognises pornography when we can’t do it ourselves?
Even if we could, we shouldn’t. In the light of the pervasive powers granted by the Investigatory Powers Act and proposed by the Digital Economy Bill, we should be wary of building yet more infrastructure to filter the internet.
“What Hunt is proposing is real-time processing of every image shared digitally,” says at Cardiff Metropolitan University, UK. “Suddenly the capability is there to not just look at porn, but what is shared at specific locations, or things someone doesn’t want seen.” Crick says there’s a massive risk of mission creep: “Once the infrastructure exists, it’s very easily repurposeable.”
Hunt’s plea will play well with concerned parents, but Crick, who has been working to reform UK computer education, views tighter controls as not just technically unfeasible, but strategically wrong. “We’re trying to create competent and capable young people who can confidently navigate the internet,” he says. “But suddenly we see this paternalistic approach of protecting them from the internet by simply closing it down.”
Filters are hackable
Just as children invariably find their way around internet filters at school, blocking certain types of content on social networks will invariably shift teens’ activity onto different, less regulated services. Crick says that while protecting children online is clearly desirable, it’s less obvious where the responsibility lies: “If your child is aged under 12, should they have unsupervised access to the internet?”
The health secretary’s comments betray our own uneasiness about sexual awareness in young teens. There’s no doubt that we’re seeing a dramatic change in norms around sex and sharing sexual content, which comes hand in hand with the potential for abuse through revenge porn and extortion. But sexting isn’t about to go away, and demanding that social media companies block explicit images refuses to engage with how teens – and the rest of us – use the internet.
If the minister really wants to tackle problems around sexual activity and mental health in young people, he ought to spend less time demanding magical fixes from Silicon Valley and more time ensuring Britain’s youth have access to high quality sexual education and well-funded mental health services.