èƵ

SpaceX Mars mission is a chance to hunt for life on the planet

The private space flight firm’s plan to send a lander to Mars in 2018 isn’t just ambitious – it’s our best chance yet of finding life on the planet
Mars lander
Mars in 2019?
SpaceX

IT WAS only , but it takes us a step closer to finding out if there is life on Mars.

On 27 April, private spaceflight company SpaceX used Twitter to announce its intention to send its Dragon capsule to the Red Planet as soon as 2018 – and it seems like it may actually happen. The timeline has been labelled ambitious, but realistic.

The Red Dragon mission is step one in CEO Elon Musk’s even more ambitious plan to send people to live on Mars. If Red Dragon flies, it may become the quickest way to deliver experiments to search for life on the Martian surface – or even bring a piece of Mars back to Earth. NASA is already in talks with SpaceX to send such an experiment to the planet should this mission be a success.

“Everything about Dragon since the beginning has been done with Mars in mind, you can tell from the design,” says Jim Bell of Arizona State University in Tempe, who has worked on several NASA missions to Mars, including the planned Mars 2020 rover.

“Everything SpaceX has done since the beginning has been done with Mars in mind“

Details of SpaceX’s plan are scarce at the moment, although Musk is expected to reveal more in September at the International Astronautical Conference in Guadalajara, Mexico. The overall plan has been in motion since at least 2011, says Brian Glass at NASA Ames Research Center in California.

“This is not out of the blue,” Glass says. “It’s not just boom, two years off the block. This is more like a seven-year effort that culminates with launch in 2018 and goes from there.”

SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket first launched in 2010 and its Dragon capsule has been ferrying cargo to the International Space Station since 2012. The trip to Mars will use souped-up versions of both: the Falcon Heavy rocket, which is essentially three stages of the Falcon 9 rocket strapped together, and the Dragon 2 capsule, which will eventually transport astronauts to and from the ISS.

“If the Falcon Heavy stays on schedule and the Dragon 2 stays on schedule, they can make 2018,” says former NASA chief technologist Robert Braun, now at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta.

Neither piece of kit has been extensively tested yet. The first Falcon Heavy launch is scheduled for later this year, and Dragon 2 is set to undergo test flights this year and next year.

The tough part won’t be getting the spacecraft to Mars, but getting it down to the surface (see “Red Planet’s curse“). With its thin atmosphere and strong gravity, Mars is a difficult place to land. At 900 kilograms, NASA’s Curiosity rover pushed the mass limit for what parachutes can carry to the surface, and its daring hovercraft landing in 2012 was called “seven minutes of terror”.

Dragon 2 will weigh in at about 6400 kilograms, more than seven times heavier. It will be equipped with eight engines that will allow it to hover. They were tested when the capsule was dangling from a crane in January (see photo, far right). That’s “key for Mars landing”, SpaceX tweeted on 27 April. It will probably use a combination of parachutes and retrorockets to reach the surface, but even so it’s no easy feat.

“SpaceX wouldn’t [make this announcement] unless they had a reasonable approach to entry, descent and landing,” says space policy expert John Logsdon of George Washington University.

It will also have the most experienced Mars lander in the business on its side: NASA. The space agency is partnering with SpaceX on the Mars mission, offering its deep space communications network and expertise in exchange for access to SpaceX’s data.

In Martian footsteps

So once Red Dragon arrives at Mars, what will it do? SpaceX’s private funding puts it in a position to send any experiment Musk fancies – although it is bound by international planetary protection requirements to shield anything that might live on Mars from destruction by incoming spacecraft.

“The 2018 flight is a demonstrator,” Glass says. “It’s their ride and their rocket. There’s no commitment on their part to fly anything at all, not even a wheel of cheese, on these flights.”

The launch date is also too soon to build a custom experiment, but SpaceX could bring in an off-the-shelf experiment if it chooses.

But the firm is in preliminary discussions with Glass and colleagues to include an instrument called Mars Icebreaker Life on future Red Dragon missions, possibly as early as 2020. This would land at the icy north pole, near the Mars Phoenix lander site. Phoenix, which was equipped with a drill, was the first Mars mission to taste water ice, but couldn’t search for life directly.

Icebreaker would have a drill that can reach at least 1 metre below the surface, and three different instruments that would “search for specific biomolecules that would be conclusive evidence of life”, the team wrote in a 2012 paper.

“Icebreaker is different in that it is looking for components for extant life,” Glass says.

That would be a departure in itself. Since the Viking mission in the 1970s, NASA has shied away from searching for life directly, opting instead to show that environments would have been habitable if life had happened to take hold. Astrobiology budgets have also been shrinking over the past 15 years.

“In my view the Mars programme (and the Mars science community) has been reluctant to embrace life detection,” says Chris McKay, also at NASA Ames. “SpaceX may be interested in life detection if not as a pure science question then as an astronaut health and safety issue.”

Future SpaceX missions could even send a chunk of Mars back to Earth. The return of Martian samples has been a top priority for years, and some consider it the only reliable way to test rocks for signs of life.

Earlier this year, a study by Andrew Gonzales and Carol Stoker at NASA Ames showed that Red Dragon would be able to carry equipment to launch a recovered sample towards Earth without the need to rendezvous in Mars orbit with another spacecraft (Acta Astronautica, ).

“The competition isn’t between NASA and SpaceX – it’s between humans and Mars“

That would make sample return simpler and cheaper than previous mission designs, they say. If the Mars 2020 rover collects rocks and stores them for future pickup by a Red Dragon mission, it could become simpler still.

The alliance between SpaceX and NASA on Red Dragon may signal a more collaborative phase in space exploration just as ambitions to go to Mars seemed to be waning. We are no longer in a space race world, Logsdon says. “There’s really not a geopolitical question for which the answer is, ‘go to Mars’,” he says.

NASA’s budget is unstable – the same day that SpaceX made its announcement, funding for a balloon-like aerobraking system the agency was designing for Mars was cut. But as the old guard, NASA still has the most experience. Combining that know-how with the commercial sector’s energy and flexibility makes sense.

“The competition should not be between SpaceX and NASA,” says Jonathan McDowell of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. “It’s between humans and Mars.”

“I think the idea of NASA working with them is a precursor to how we’re going to be exploring in the future,” agrees Logsdon. “When we go to Mars, it’s going to be a partnership between multiple countries, and between government and industry. Here’s one early instance of that.”

Red planet’s curse

Mars eats spacecraft. More than half of all Mars missions have failed, earning the planet the nickname “Mount Everest of the solar system”. Only four space agencies have successfully sent orbiters to Mars: NASA, the European Space Agency, Russia’s space agency and most recently India’s. One famous failure was the 1998 Mars Climate Orbiter, which lost contact with Earth because of a failure to convert between standard and metric units.

Only NASA has sent landers that lasted longer than a minute. The USSR’s Mars 3 lander touched down safely in 1971, but only returned 20 seconds of data.

So what makes Mars so difficult? Mainly it’s the air: at just 1 per cent the density of Earth’s atmosphere, the Martian atmosphere doesn’t create much drag, making it difficult to slow a heavy craft’s descent using parachutes. But it’s still thick enough to batter spacecraft with turbulence, making a purely thruster-powered landing an equally big challenge. The heat of atmospheric friction could burn up an improperly protected lander, and wind and dust storms could send it off course.

NASA used a combination of parachutes, air bags, retrorockets and a sky crane to lower its craft to the surface. SpaceX plans to use eight thrusters to hover before landing.

Even if no science kit is onboard SpaceX’s first Red Dragon flight, it will be useful. Red Dragon would be the heaviest thing ever to land on Mars. Just showing that it is possible will be a big step.

This article appeared in print under the headline “Hunt for life on Mars”

Topics: Astrobiology / Elon Musk / Mars / Space flight / SpaceX