
Feedback is our weekly column of bizarre stories, implausible advertising claims, confusing instructions and more
Now here was the news
WITH typical topicality we turn up a message Lance Andrewes sent in January. It being about the “most read” section on the , our delay is appropriate. When Lance looked, the second slot was occupied by “” – a story from CBBC, the British broadcaster’s service for children, published in December 2006.
Typically, we concluded with Lance, such things happen when someone on an over-popular website says “Lookee here!” and the throng follows. We cannot rule out campaigns to make stories reappear from the past.
Advertisement
Lance thinks the phenomenon needs a name. “Repopular” sounds, he concedes, “lame, but it’s all I can think of. I’m too busy reading old stories.” Feedback is torn between “revenant news”, “revenant kittens” and “olds”. Any better ideas?
“Non-urgent X-rays hit by ” read a Dundee Courier headline on 13 October. Ian Davidson knows the subject is serious, but he still likes the idea of lackadaisical light
Google Truth™
ANACHRONISMS will become ever more frequent with the advent of displays that provide people with “information about the landmarks, buildings and businesses they are looking at in the real world”, as predicted in our report on Google’s Knowledge Vault (23 August p 18).
Erik Wahlström wondered how this system will be financed, and concludes: “By advertising. Of course.” This may be fun. We hope for a software plug-in inspired by the 1988 John Carpenter film , whose hero discovers a pair of sunglasses that automagically display billboards’ real messages: “Consume”, “Obey”, “Watch TV.”
Pains and needles
IT IS not often that Feedback receives a message from a reader that contains the phrase “my acupuncturist”. John Cleveland explains that he has a painful condition. The US Medicare scheme will not pay for newer and more expensive patented pain relievers. The state of Indiana, ever vigilant in case drugs should be enjoyed, or used to relieve non-physical pain, last year imposed on doctors prescribing opioid drugs.
So in order to continue his prescription John is required to see “a pain manager, a psychiatrist, a psychologist, an acupuncturist/massage therapist, and others”. He “cannot say that acupuncture works. It is just a hurdle I must clear.”
There must be a better way. There is, and it reminds Feedback to value the UK’s National Health Service.
Flashlight rebuffed
WE CAN now turn to the tale of a salescreature trying to sell John Cleveland’s acupuncturist (above)a “Healing System” that “creates photon and amplified negative free electron energies passing through vials of multi-botanical solutions”. The curious device, at , bears a remarkable superficial resemblance to a chrome flashlight.
How might it work? “Photon energy is capable of carrying the harmonics or vibrational frequencies of the contents of any liquid through which it passes,” the website assures us. It is reticent about claiming cures: but apparently the salescreature said it could cure concussion. To the acupuncturist’s credit, John reports that “she gently showed them the door”.
Can’t read email? Email…
SUBSCRIBERS to the British Film Institute’s magazine are told that “we are unable to make the printed index a continued resource”, but it will be available to download. “If you do not have access to a computer,” the BFI continues, helpfully, “then please contact us and we can arrange for a printed copy to be posted to you”. And how would you make contact if you lack access to a computer? By emailing s&s@bfi.org.uk of course.
Liverish Francophobia
(PETA) crows that catering for London’s Somerset House ice-skating rink is now “” and that this “undoubtedly reflects the wish of the majority of the members of the public, who want to see the sale of this vile French product banned in the UK”.
Hang on. Why overshadow an argument about harm to animals by stressing that the product is French? We feel incited to form a popular society for the ethical treatment of France, to be known by its nearly-pronounceable French acronym, SPTEF.
Symmetry on a plate
INTRIGUED by our consideration of the properties, if any, of “ineffable numbers” (1 November), a reader requests permission to “lower the tone of your numbers discussion”. Their car, registered in 1960, bears the identifier “LSL 929”. This, they observe, is “a double palindrome”. Further, “the number part is the highest palindromic prime below 1000.” Do any readers also have interesting numbers?
What is the hidden danger?
ANONYMITY seemed best for the reader mentioned above. People have been exercised enough about car number plates being publicly associated with a name or location for them to campaign successfully for plates to be blurred out in online imagery.
Feedback had presumed that there is some risk of identity theft, or similar. But we now realise that we have no idea how the feared scam would work. Purely in the interests of logical completeness – can you help?