Worried about nuclear proliferation? Not much has changed in 50 years. In , signatories to a letter in 快猫短视频 agreed with the UK鈥檚 minister for science, Lord Hailsham, who said: 鈥淚f we go on indefinitely experimenting with nuclear weapons, manufacturing them and stockpiling them, boasting of their potentialities, and keeping them at instant readiness, sooner or later a situation will arise, sometime, somewhere, where one will go off鈥�.
The same letter could be written today. Half a century on, no nuclear weapons have been fired in anger, but the laws of statistics and of unintended consequences are both probably awaiting their moment.
Back in the 1960s, though, many of us were still in awe, and the benefits of nuclear fission were being hailed. Not so by July 1979, when disposing of nuclear waste from power stations was the hot topic. We reported then that it was important that the waste 鈥渞emain undamaged for up to 1000 years鈥�. At the end of the 20th century, we predicted, , cast into lead blocks, and buried deep underground. Whether the lead or the nuclear waste would be the most damaging to the environment, we failed to mention.
Advertisement
By July 2009, our concerns had shifted somewhat. Amid the recession that continues today, cost had become a key issue. The UK government was uncertain whether it could afford to renew its Trident nuclear weapons programme. The future of ballistic missile submarines is 鈥渦p for grabs鈥�, we reported a government official as saying. The official was right 鈥� the debate still rages today.
