
The AppleWorld beyond infinity
LIKE most 5-year-olds, Matt Tapsell’s son Ethan has an inquisitive and questioning mind. Recently he has wanted to know what the biggest number in the world is.
Matt explained that there is no such thing: numbers can continue to get bigger and bigger, never reaching what is called “infinity”. Unsurprisingly to anyone who has ever discussed things with a young child, this does not satisfy Ethan. He insists that there is a largest number and has given it a name: “AppleWorld”. It is a one surrounded by zeros, he declares, and it takes the shape of an apple – of course.
Advertisement
One bedtime, Ethan and Matt were discussing number sequences. Matt gave Ethan a series of numbers, leaving Ethan to fill in the next one in the sequence. They did this counting in twos, fives, tens and so forth, until a cunning Ethan said, “Let’s do AppleWorld.” Matt was just about to say, “One AppleWorld, two AppleWorlds…” when Ethan stopped him by reminding him that there is no such sequence: it’s just AppleWorld.
Matt says: “Those who mock this idea by saying ‘simply add 1 to AppleWorld’ haven’t quite grasped Ethan’s concept, since that new number is also AppleWorld; and to those who say, ‘isn’t that infinity?’, the answer is that it’s not, because infinity is by definition never-ending and AppleWorld is a definite number.”
Matt muses: “Perhaps the universe is limited rather than never-ending, so why can’t there be an ultimate limit on numbers?
“If nothing else, this shows that the exploration of theoretical mathematics is not the preserve of university professors, but sits quite comfortably in a 5-year-old’s break between the latest Doctor Who episode and stints on the games console.”
Or perhaps, since the AppleWorld idea was raised just before bedtime, it was simply a plot by Ethan to infinitely postpone sleep.
“CAUTION: Avoid contact with any plastics.” This was the instruction on the plastic bottle of Dentyl Active Plaque Fighter mouthwash that Nick Rutter bought
FEEDBACK’s mathematics consultant couldn’t resist commenting on the above. “I suspect that Ethan has rediscovered the surreal numbers,” he observes. “Yes, really. Just as there are infinitely many real numbers between each pair of whole numbers, there are infinitely many surreal numbers between each pair of real numbers.
“This was discussed by Robert Matthews in his èƵ feature ‘The man who played God with infinity’ (2 September 1995, p 36). And there is a logical machine, devised in 1969 by John Horton Conway while exploring his and the game of Go, for enumerating the surreals – and it also generates definite infinite numbers.”
So now you know. Ethan really was on to something.
ON A different topic, reader Elizabeth Romanaux draws our attention to what she aptly calls an “enigmatic product”. It’s a fluorite crystal that has been “activated” by a company called Celestial Lights of Colorado, for $49.95 a throw.
The website explains, in the lurid colours we have come to expect from such adverts, that: “Our crystals are unique because we activate or ‘charge’ them energetically in our Pranava Energy Activator.” What might that be? It says Prana is Sanskrit for “the Breathe of the Creator”, and that the Activator “basically charges each crystal with a special Lifetronic Light Frequency or Prana. The crystal is now charged and activated permanently to attract and transmit charged Lifetrons or Prana healing energy.”
There’s more. Before we hurt our brain by trying to read on, can anyone tell us what “Lifetrons” are? “I wonder,” Elizabeth says, “if they are like positrons?”
The good news about climate change
AN ARTICLE by Don Aitkin, former chairman of the Australian Research Council, was published in The Australian newspaper on 19 January. Headlined , it attacks the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, the country’s public broadcaster, for its negative reporting of the effects of climate change.
One sentence stood out for Feedback reader Luke Wilson. Aitkin wrote: “My memory may be faulty, but I cannot recall the ABC telling any good news stories about rising sea levels.”
Luke’s comment on this has, we think, a distinctively Australian flavour: “What, pray, would constitute such a story? That the beach will soon be closer?”
FINALLY, Guy Cox tells us about an email he received from an Indian scientist who contributes to the journal he edits. It said: “My Gmail account was hacked. Please do not act on any mail sent from my Gmail account. I am taking necessary steps. Thanks.”
Guy’s problem is that this message was sent from the scientist’s Gmail account.
“I suppose I therefore should not act on it. But then if I get another message that must mean I should act on it…