快猫短视频

Mega-risks that could drive us to extinction

Technological hazards that could wipe out the human race will be studied by a proposed research centre at the University of Cambridge

The end is not nigh, but it could be unless we constrain our own technological ingenuity. That鈥檚 the warning from an initiative in Cambridge, UK, that wants to create a centre to focus on huge, technological hazards that could wipe out the human race at a stroke.

These dangers would include robots that escape our control, nuclear war, doomsday plagues designed in laboratories, and devastation from climate change triggered by human activity.

鈥淲e鈥檙e talking about threats to our very existence stemming from human activity,鈥 says , a professor of cosmology and astrophysics at the University of Cambridge. Along with Cambridge philosopher and Jaan Tallinn, inventor of Skype, he has founded the Cambridge Project for Existential Risk.

Wrong focus

Rees says we focus too much on tiny risks that are widespread, such as trace contaminants in food, and too little on massive, one-off risks that could wipe us out. To counteract this, Rees, Price and Tallinn are proposing creating a at Cambridge.

鈥淲e don鈥檛 think enough about low-probability, high-impact events, where one might be too many,鈥 says Rees. 鈥淭he financial crash is a good example of something not predicted, and there will be other events of that type that have never happened before, but which we need to anticipate,鈥 he says. The centre would, hopefully, forestall our extinction by exploring how these mega-risks can be predicted and controlled.

AI threat

鈥淲e need to take seriously the possibility that there might be a 鈥楶andora鈥檚 box鈥 moment with artificial intelligence that, if missed, could be catastrophic,鈥 says Price. That critical point might come when computers can write their own programs, he says.

New concerns about 鈥渒iller鈥 robots also emerged last month in the US, where the non-governmental organisation Human Rights Watch released a report entitled .

鈥淕iving machines the power to decide who lives and dies on the battlefield would take technology too far,鈥 says Steve Goose of Human Rights Watch.