Astrophile is our weekly column on curious cosmic objects, from the solar system to the far reaches of the multiverse
Objects: Four stars in the Tarantula Nebula
Characteristics: big, bright and seemingly impossible
Freakishly huge and uncomfortably bright, a quartet of stars sits huddled in the Tarantula Nebula, outcasts in a universe that says they shouldn鈥檛 exist.
Advertisement
Nestled in the , the giants are each around 300 times as massive as our sun. They鈥檙e surrounded by more conservative neighbours, stars no heftier than 150 solar masses. According to generally accepted norms, that鈥檚 as big as a star should be.
鈥淭he assumption of an upper limit of 150 solar masses has been central to our theory of star formation for a while now,鈥� says at Imperial College London. With no good explanation for their bulk, the stellar anomalies were quickly branded monsters.
Now a band of scientists says these impossible bodies are actually misunderstood. The monsters weren鈥檛 born big, they simply grew up in a rough neighbourhood and reached outlandish sizes to survive violent clashes.
Monster mash
Sambaran Banerjee and colleagues at the in Germany developed a computer simulation that traced the evolution of a cluster akin to R136, star by star. The model revealed the interactions of more than 170,000 normal-sized stars packed closely together, including standard binary pairs in stable orbits.
In such a crowded environment, stability is short-lived. 鈥淭he binary鈥檚 pleasant, peaceful, predictable and periodic circular orbit is perturbed by passing stars, which are plentiful in this rich, dense cluster environment,鈥� says of George Mason University in Virginia, who was not involved in the study.
Sometimes, stars in very close binary orbits would become so erratic that they would smash into each other and merge, giving rise to a monster.
These giants don鈥檛 appear in every star cluster because cooking them up requires special conditions. The grouping must be dense enough for stars to be especially close, and young enough so that stellar winds haven鈥檛 yet blown the giants down to standard sizes.
鈥淭hese massive stars always have strong winds and lose mass rapidly,鈥� says Banerjee. 鈥淎fter about 1.5 million years the wind becomes particularly strong and the star enters what is called a Wolf-Rayet phase.鈥� By about 2 million years the star will have lost more than half of its mass and will be able to blend in with its normal neighbours.
of the University of Sheffield in the UK led the project that first weighed the fearsome foursome in 2010. He thinks this is the best simulation done so far, and that the binary explanation is entirely plausible.
However, the results only show that these mergers could happen, not that they have to happen. It鈥檚 possible, he says, that regular-sized stars managed to consume a lot of extra gas by being in the right place at the right time.
Either way, it鈥檚 time to stop calling them monsters, says Banerjee, who prefers to think of the giants as 鈥渟uper-stars鈥�.
Journal reference: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (in press); arxiv.org/abs/1208.0826
