èƵ

A time of change for forensic scientists

With the closure of the Forensic Science Service, forensic scientists in England and Wales are enduring upheaval

“I GUESS I’m a success story,” says Paul Yates, who since May has worked at , a small company based in Norwich. For the previous 17 years, Yates had worked at the (FSS), the main provider of forensic expertise to the police forces in England and Wales. In December 2010, it was announced that the service would be wound down by March 2012 and its 1500 staff made redundant. The government-owned company had lost a number of significant contracts and was apparently losing £2 million a month.

Having worked for a long time at the FSS, Yates was fearful that he wouldn’t be able to do anything else: “I had been working within what I considered to be the rather specialised world of criminal justice.” But his worries were unfounded. “I found that my skill set and experience was in fact precisely what this private company was looking for,” he says.

“My skill set and experience was exactly what this small, private company was looking for”

Despite the head of research and development at the FSS, Gillian Tully, telling the in March that around 90 per cent of the 300 or so staff in the three FSS centres that have already shut “have left the profession completely”, it is not all bad news. Those deciding to stay in the industry have found new opportunities open to them.

In fact, there are several reasons for FSS employees and forensic science graduates to be optimistic. After all, crime is here to stay so the forensic science workload is not going to diminish. Police forces and the criminal justice system still need forensic work carried out – it is more a question of redistributing the work among the remaining providers.

Many former FSS staff are being recruited by smaller companies, such as , the largest of the privately owned providers with offices across the UK, and , based in Abingdon, Oxfordshire. Steve Allen, managing director of LGC Forensics, said earlier this year that the firm aimed to increase its workforce by between 50 and 100 per cent. “We have been gearing up to support the substantial increase in our workload,” he told èƵ. “We have been actively recruiting at all levels and expect to see a significant increase in the number of forensic scientists we employ.”

DzԻDz’s is also likely to snap up some FSS staff as part of its recruitment drive. “We have small labs of our own where we do some evidence recovery, and we intend to expand our capability to include specialist scientists who can deal with a wider range of serious cases,” says Gary Pugh, the Met’s director of forensic services.

In an attempt to use resources more efficiently, the Met also plans to “implement more effective case management” that will form closer ties with the criminal justice system. “To put it crudely,” says Pugh, “rather than just seizing all the material at the crime scene, putting it in bags and sending it off to the lab with a vague instruction of ‘forensicate it!’, the new approach will take a much more focused and prioritised way of looking at crime-scene exhibits and examining the ones that are most relevant.”

Change of direction

There are other opportunities too. “Some people who have been working in the FSS for years have taken [its closure] as an opportunity to diversify,” says Laura Walton, a lecturer and careers adviser in the forensics and crime scene department at Staffordshire University in Stoke-on-Trent. “Some are moving into academia, which is brilliant for universities as it gives us a really close link to what is actually going on in forensic science.”

Graduates are also in a good position. “Graduates can be trained to work exactly how you want,” says Walton. “They don’t have preconceived ideas about operating procedures. They are fresh-faced, enthusiastic, willing to relocate and, frankly, they come in at a lower wage bracket. There is definitely a good market for graduates out there.”

One thing that any forensics professional or budding professional can do in today’s uncertain times is to make use of the additional educational and networking opportunities that being a member of their professional body offers. Ann Priston, president of the , says the society has seen an increase in professional membership since the FSS closure was announced. She recommends forensic scientists looking for work attend the society’s in November.

Priston agrees that the employment level for graduates is high right now and it is a sentiment echoed by Leon Barron, who teaches a master’s course in forensic science at King’s College London. “Despite the FSS closing, a lot of our graduates are securing jobs,” he says. A year after his students have completed the course, Barron estimates that 80 per cent are employed, with another 10 per cent doing a PhD. By the standards of any industry, those numbers are reasons to be cheerful.

For students considering a career in forensic science, the advice from those in the know is consistent: you don’t need an undergraduate degree in forensics to be a forensic scientist. “It is worthwhile studying for a good science degree rather than a forensic specific one, ensuring fall-back options,” says Lindsay Lennen, a homicide team leader at LGC’s lab in Culham, Oxfordshire. Walton agrees: “If you’ve done a degree with a lot of chemistry or biology, you have a wide range of career options beyond forensic science.”

Employers do look for formal training though, says Barron, so once you have the basic science skills down, apply for one of the many forensic science postgraduate courses out there to learn the more niche aspects of the role. He says employers are also looking to recruit people with industry experience and this is where outgoing FSS staff are particularly strong as “they would have accrued a lot of casework experience”.

Which brings us back to Yates. How easy was the transition from a dominant organisation in the industry to a start-up which boasted a staff of just four when he joined? “You’re immediately moved out of your comfort zone because you’re suddenly in the heart of things, and you no longer have this big pool of people that you can rely on to do things for you,” he says. “It’s given me a different challenge.”

The CSI effect

It is seemingly impossible to talk about the allure of a career in forensic science without referring to the “CSI effect”. But in reality, every generation has their own inspiration, from Quincey, ME, in the late 1970s to Silent Witness, which began in the 1990s and is still running today. For Jo Millington, a forensic specialist working in the homicide division of the Forensic Science Service (FSS), her epiphany came early. “I got into forensic science because I saw the BBC series Indelible Evidence back in the 1980s. From that moment I was hooked. I was 13.”

Today Millington has more than 15 years of experience in forensic investigation. Her expertise is in blood pattern analysis – the analysis of the pattern, size, shape and location of blood stains, which can be very useful in the reconstruction of events at a crime scene. If there are elements of a crime that could benefit from bespoke experimentation or reconstruction – with horse blood – then Millington is your go-to woman. On the FSS closure, she says she is “so invested in forensic science that I am not contemplating a future outside” of the profession.

So how would she describe her work today? “It’s like the US TV show Dexter really, except I don’t go around murdering my colleagues.” Move over CSI.

More from èƵ

Explore the latest news, articles and features