
Read more: “Instant Expert: Carbon capture and storage“
Burning fossil fuels provides most of the world’s electrical energy. It also produces large amounts of carbon dioxide. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) offers one of the most direct and rapid ways of reducing CO2 emissions right now. It involves capturing CO2 from the exhaust gases of large emitters, such as power plants, natural gas production platforms and industry. The gas is then transported by pipe or ship and injected into porous rock to be stored deep underground for millennia. Using CCS to capture and store CO2 emissions will be crucial to preventing atmospheric CO2 concentrations reaching a level that will drastically change global climate and the acidity of the oceans.
The impact of carbon dioxide
The volume of CO2 released by humans has overwhelmed the Earth’s natural carbon cycle. Concentrations of CO2 in the atmosphere and upper layers of the ocean have risen significantly since industrialisation.
Advertisement
The effects are twofold. First, the atmosphere retains more heat, leading to global warming and regional climate change. The most recent predictions from climate scientists make a 2 °C warming look inevitable by 2100, and a 5 °C warming quite possible.
The other effect is less well known but very potent: ocean acidification. When CO2 dissolves in water, it forms carbonic acid. Ocean acidity has been stable for the past 20 million years, but climate scientists predict that by 2100 our seas will be four times as acidic as they are now. The effects on marine ecosystems and the species that depend on them, including humans, could be catastrophic.
Halfway to disaster
How much CO2 is too much? Nobody knows for sure, but sophisticated climate models suggest that if average global temperatures rise more than 2°C then the consequences are likely to be dramatic, from more natural disasters to increased agriculture failures. The concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere needed to force a 2°C rise can be calculated: around 450 parts per million.
A simpler way to consider this threshold is to calculate the total mass of carbon that we would need to burn and emit as CO2 to force a 2°C rise. That turns out to be 1 trillion tonnes of carbon (or 3.6 trillion tonnes of CO2). This is a useful concept, because it means we can estimate how much of this total fossil carbon “budget” we have already used. By looking to projected rates of fossil fuel combustion, we can also calculate how much time is left until the remainder of the budget is used up.
The results are shocking. The world is already around halfway through its budget of carbon emissions. To satisfy growing energy demand, the “trillionth tonne” of carbon is likely to be burnt within the next 20 to 30 years.
Reducing emissions
For the near future, we will continue to rely on coal, oil and gas for more than 80 per cent of our energy needs. It will take time to develop programmes of energy efficiency and renewable power generation. So unless we are willing to gamble on the future ecology of the continents and oceans, then there is no better way to rapidly reduce carbon emissions over the next 30 to 60 years than by capturing and storing CO2.
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is no panacea, but it could provide a major contribution to emissions reduction. The International Energy Agency calculated the cost-effectiveness of the various methods for reducing emissions, and concluded that CCS should provide one-fifth of the reductions required by 2050 (see diagram). Achieving the same cuts without CCS will cost massively more.
For this reason, CCS is an integral part of the low-carbon ambitions of rich industrialised nations, such as the members of the European Union, the US, Canada, Norway and Australia. It is also recognised as an important technology by rapidly industrialising nations like China, South Africa and Brazil.
For CCS to deliver, it will need to be installed on all new and existing power plants burning fossil fuels as well as on industrial sources of CO2. CCS requires extremely large and complex equipment. Large-scale industrial development of CCS has to start now, in 2011, to make the required impact on CO2 emissions – a challenge unprecedented in scale and cost.