IT IS humanity鈥檚 oldest enemy. Despite all our science, a sixth of people in the developing world are chronically hungry. , world leaders reaffirmed a pledge 鈥渁t the earliest possible date鈥�.
The UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) wanted them to promise to end hunger by 2025, but the delegates declined. They said instead that they would keep trying to meet their previous goal: to halve chronic hunger from 20 per cent of people in developing countries to 10 per cent by 2015 (see graph). But can they? Based on their performance so far, the FAO considers it 鈥渦nlikely鈥�.
Advertisement
That, agricultural experts tell 快猫短视频, is because governments have broken their promises and slashed aid budgets for agriculture. The hungry poor fell to 16 per cent in 2007, mainly thanks to Asia鈥檚 economic boom, but recession and soaring food prices pushed it back to 17 per cent in 2008.
鈥淓nding hunger by 2025 is not realistic,鈥� says Joachim von Braun of IFPRI, a food-policy institute in Washington DC. 鈥淗alving it might be, but it requires sustained action.鈥�
It gets worse: global population is set to grow to 9.1 billion by 2050, while global warming will have a serious impact on farming. What can be done?
The FAO says people will require a near-doubling in food production. All nations will have to take part, but attention will be focused on poor countries, where there is most room for improvement and where better farming will give poor farmers income to buy food. The FAO says farming investment in poor countries must grow from $142 billion per year to $209 billion.
Agricultural research must also increase. The Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) 鈥� the international, mainly government-funded labs that perform farm research for poor countries 鈥� says agricultural R&D spending for developing countries needs to grow from $5.1 billion to $16.4 billion per year by 2025. Its researchers say that in theory, given funds, they can boost agriculture enough to double food production, although global warming may make this impossible. These are their top priorities.
1 Hold on to water
The UN Food and Agriculture Organization says irrigated areas must expand by 11 per cent by 2025, yet the ancient aquifers that feed much of the world鈥檚 food production are running dry.
of the Swedish Resilience Centre in Stockholm says we need to rethink water. 鈥淏lue鈥� water, which flows in streams, is the usual basis for farm planning yet accounts for just 5 to 15 per cent of the water flowing through farming systems. The rest, 鈥済reen鈥� water, is either lost through run-off or evaporation or passes usefully through crops. There are several ways to capture more of this green water in crops, including soil-covering mulches, terraces, and underground tanks filled by the run-off from tropical downpours. In parts of Kenya and China such tanks can get a crop through the dry spell that frequently follows a downpour.
Mapping the potential for combining all of these approaches shows that the largest untapped potential to improve water productivity is in the savannahs, says Rockstr枚m. This is sometimes counter-intuitive, he adds. 鈥淒ry Namibia and Botswana have more than enough green water to feed themselves.鈥�
2 Stop ploughing
For 1000 years, farmers have turned over the top layer of soil to bury and kill weed seeds. This is expensive, damages soils and releases greenhouse gases.
Most maize and soya growers in the Americas have abandoned the plough for 鈥渘o-till鈥� farming: they merely scratch furrows in the ground to plant their seed and handle weeds with herbicides and herbicide-resistant genetically modified crops.
But farmers do not need those if they smother weeds with organic residue such as straw, and rotate crops to frustrate pests, says Bram Govaerts of the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT) in Mexico, a CGIAR lab. This is known as conservation agriculture, and besides conserving soil, nutrients and energy, it cuts water loss. Govaerts has been managing experimental plots in Mexico using these methods, and finds that conservation agriculture can .
3 Go back to basics
Creating high-yielding seeds is only worthwhile if farmers have access to them, and can sell their produce for a profit. 鈥淭here are varieties of maize that resist climate stress or disease, but how do you get them to farmers?鈥� asks Prabhu Pingali, deputy head of agriculture at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
is a case in point. This dryland variety was bred in the 1990s by CGIAR scientists who crossed Asian rice with an African species. Nerica competes better with weeds than other varieties, yields more and contains more protein. But few African farmers have heard of it.
Government services that taught farmers new techniques were dismantled during the debt crisis of the 1980s, says Papa Seck, head of the CGIAR鈥檚 African Rice Center in Cotonou, Benin. 鈥淲e need them back.鈥�
Even if they have access to better seed varieties, African farmers often don鈥檛 invest in boosting production because they don鈥檛 have access to markets and therefore cannot sell their extra crops for a profit. And sold or not, crops are often poorly stored and lost to rot: half the bananas grown in Kenya are lost each year, says Peter Hartmann of IITA, CGIAR鈥檚 tropical agriculture lab in Ibadan, Nigeria. He says Africa would not need imported food aid if it could use all the crops it produces.
You have to look at the whole food system to boost production, says Hartmann. For instance, IITA bred higher-yielding, disease-resistant cassava and helped set up factories to grind the crop into flour; but then discovered uptake was limited because there was limited transport: cassava grows in southern Nigeria, the trucking industry is in the north. After publicity brought truckers in, production grew from 35 million to 45 million tonnes, on less land, from 2004 to 2007.
4 Boost yields
Mark Rosegrant of the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) calculates that crops that will yield 25 per cent more food more than doubling irrigation would. It might also be easier. 鈥淲e have tremendous options to enhance yields,鈥� says Hans Braun, head of wheat at the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center.
Last week the world鈥檚 wheat scientists to raise wheat yield by genetically re-engineering the crop鈥檚 photosynthesis, no less. 鈥淚t is inefficient compared with some plants,鈥� says Braun. 鈥淚mprovements are feasible, and will dramatically increase water efficiency, heat tolerance and yield.鈥� They plan to equip wheat with more efficient variants of the key photosynthetic enzyme rubisco, and with suites of genes to convert it from the C3 photosynthetic system to the C4 system found in maize, which fixes more carbon per unit of light. Meanwhile, CGIAR鈥檚 International Rice Research Institute in the Philippines is developing C4 rice.
Braun says the key is money. The yields of new varieties of maize are climbing twice as fast as yields of rice and wheat. This is because maize is bred mainly by private companies, which invest $1.5 billion a year in it. Wheat and rice breeding, by contrast, is done mostly in government labs. Wheat gets only about $350 million a year. Apart from Chinese hybrid rice varieties, rice yields have been stagnant for years.
