èƵ

The US lets go of the internet – will anyone notice?

The body that governs the net will now have global membership, which makes everyone happy but won't change much
ICANN relax control over the internet
ICANN relax control over the internet
(Image: Stone/Getty)

POLITICAL power is rarely ceded without good reason. So eyebrows were raised last week when the US Department of Commerce decided to relax its grip on the (ICANN), the body responsible for the naming system that ensures that when you type a web address, your browser knows where to go.

In future, governments and other international organisations will be able to nominate staff to sit on one of ICANN’s three newly created steering committees, something the DoC had resisted for years. “What it really means,” says ICANN’s chief executive Rod Beckstrom, “is that we’re going global.”

Countries that don’t use Latin characters, which ICANN says web addresses must be written in, will welcome the changes. Millions of web users are currently blocked from using domain names in their own language. Beckstrom says the changes to ICANN could soon fix that and predicts that addresses in Chinese and Arabic alphabets may emerge in little more than a year.

The change also pleases the European Union, which has for years worried about US domination of the body. “ICANN’s decisions will be more independent and more accountable,” says , European Commissioner for Information Society and Media.

It has been suggested that US fears of other countries breaking away and forming an “alternative” internet were behind their decision. However, such concerns aren’t credible, says Lesley Cowley of , which regulates .co.uk domains. “Current browsers wouldn’t be able to access it,” she says.

So will the changes improve the internet? There were already plans to accept local language domain names in the pipeline, so it is doubtful they will proceed much differently. Also, adding committees can hardly streamline a body long-accused of bureaucracy, and the internet has flourished under the existing regime.

The US may simply have been happy to relax its control because it believes the current system is sufficiently established to run under its own steam.