
Get Randy Olson’s Top five tips for communicating science from the horse’s mouth here.
DID you spot James Cameron’s mistake in Titanic? Leo DiCaprio is about to drown in the north Atlantic ocean, yet the constellations of the southern hemisphere are aglow in the sky above.
Who cares? èƵs, apparently. The mistake “ruined” the movie for Neil de Grasse Tyson, director of New York’s Hayden Planetarium, says.
Advertisement
It’s the kind of reaction that gets scientists a bad rap, and Olson – himself a scientist and film-maker – suggests it pays to skip the pedantry and concentrate on the bigger picture. While small factual errors can be irksome, they are not life-threatening, he says – especially when the scientist is in control. If you want to get a message across to the public, don’t obsess about facts.
Just look at Al Gore’s climate change documentary An Inconvenient Truth, Olson says. The film contained more than a few factual errors, but it also had a profound influence on the world’s attitude to climate change.
Perhaps compromising on accuracy is a necessary evil. If you want people to know and care about your science, take a leaf out of Hollywood’s book: focus on telling great stories; gloss over the inconvenient truths.
The idea has some appeal, but is this really the right way for scientists to go? With climate change, perhaps the end justifies the means. But Olson’s argument is predicated on the assumption that in general scientists have news and opinions that matter to the broader public. That may not always be so.
One could argue that science gets precisely the amount of attention it deserves. In fact, this seems pretty much an evolutionary principle. When some human activity threatens us as individuals or as a species, we react. Things that don’t, we permit, especially if they might be beneficial in some way, but that doesn’t mean we have to share the doer’s enthusiasm for the details of the doings.
Do we really want to run the risk of turning science into a spin game? It might well be counter-productive – not to mention unscientific – to act on Olson’s advice and start bending the facts when they get in the way of attracting people’s attention.
Then again, given Gore’s success and the prevalence of scientific illiteracy, it remains an interesting path to consider. Olson’s engaging and timely book will surely spark an important and controversial debate about science’s place in society.
By the way, if you’re going to check out the sky in the final scene of Titanic, don’t bother. When de Grasse Tyson bumped into Cameron on a New York street, the astronomer told the director of his error. By the time the 10th-anniversary DVD edition came out, the correct stars were shining over DiCaprio as he sank beneath the waves.
Island Press