èƵ

Why the dinosaurs really died out

This week's Feedback reveals that dinosaurs didn't have much in their pants, why aluminium-free products contain aluminium, and a second chance to win a piece of moon rock

CONTROVERSY still simmers over what caused the extinction of the dinosaurs. The spectacular favourite, at the time of writing, is an asteroid splashing down off Mexico’s Yucatan peninsula, but there’s always the chance that the main rival theory could erupt onto the scene again in a resurgence of lava flows across India’s Deccan Traps.

Skulking between these giant theories – almost, we are tempted to say, like a proto-mammal evading the saurian giants – is another, put forward somewhat shyly by the makers of the 3D Imax dinosaur movie imaginatively entitled Dinosaurs 3D.

What’s that theory, then? A colleague, one rainy day in London, decided to sample this marvel of cinematography. The enormity of the dinosaurs was indeed impressive – as was the filmically inevitable point where the image of a large herbivore lumbered out of the screen and into the auditorium, over the audience’s heads. While all around ducked, Feedback’s colleague looked up. The film-makers’ theory was made plain.

No genitals.

Aluminium-free apart from the aluminium

GREEN People, a company that sells skincare and beauty products to people opting for an “organic lifestyle”, says of : “Green People’s range of natural deodorants is free from pore-clogging aluminium, parabens, phthalates, ethyl alcohol and harsh, synthetic ingredients.”

It then goes on to say: “The naturally occurring mineral salt ammonium alum (alunite) is added for its strong impact on germs.” However, Philip Shaw, who noticed this, says: “Ammonium alum is actually ammonium aluminium sulphate dodecahydrate, which does contain aluminium.”

Philip is quite right. So it’s disappointing to find the British “quality” newspaper The Guardian failing to contest Green People’s promulgation of the non-aluminium myth. Mike Whittacker spotted this in an article entitled in the paper on 19 May: “Fears about the safety of aluminium-based antiperspirants have led to some people switching to natural products offered by brands such as Crystal and Green People. These contain ammonium alum, a mineral salt formed in the Earth’s crust.”

It doesn’t stop there. A quick PubMed search locates a paper on this very subject by H. Gallego and colleagues from the department of dermatology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (). Its abstract tells us: “Two patients developed an irritant dermatitis of the axillae [armpits] shortly after using an over-the-counter ‘natural deodorant crystal’ product containing alum. We discuss this previously unreported, untoward reaction to alum, an ancient agent with new-found popularity as an alternative health product.”

“Reader Kevin Picton wishes to disobey the instruction that his new password “must contain at least 0 non-alphanumeric characters” and seeks your assistance”

Struck by stationary object

WHAT exactly does this mean? Jamie Bowers directs our attention to entitled “New Zealand Extractive Industries Mining, Coal Mining, Quarrying and Tunnelling ~ Serious Harm Accident Summary 2003”, which, as well as sporting this extremely tortuous headline, contains “Table 1: classification by source”. The first three items on the table are:

  • “Struck by falling object: 3
  • “Struck by moving object: 4
  • “Struck by stationary object: 2”

We have tried without success to understand the third category. We can only assume the headline writer was at work again here, and an attempt to convey the idea of people walking into things had not come off very well.

Moon rock competition

FINALLY, would you like to own a piece of the moon?

Depending on which time zone you happen to be in, 20 or 21 July 2009 sees the 40th anniversary of the first moon landing. Our competition to celebrate that historic event offers a fabulous prize for the winner: some rock from the moon.

The competition is simple to enter. You will doubtless know the words spoken by Neil Armstrong when he stepped off Apollo 11’s lunar module and onto the moon itself: “One small step for [a] man – one giant leap for mankind.” Can you think of something else he might have said instead – something equally memorable, or perhaps something funny?

Your entry should be no more than 75 characters long (including spaces). You can send your entries by email (address below; please put “Competition” in the subject line), by fax or by post, or online at www.newscientist.com/article/dn17213, where you can also read the specifications of the rock from the moon that you could win, along with an analysis of it performed for èƵ by a team at the Open University in the UK. See also this week’s feature “When the moon lands” (page 40) on how the analysis was done.

The competition closes on 29 June and the results will be published in the 18 July issue of èƵ, in anticipation of the anniversary of the landing.

More from èƵ

Explore the latest news, articles and features