
IN JULY this year, that two people had been found guilty of murder, based largely on evidence provided by a brain-scanning technique known as brain electrical oscillations signature (BEOS) profiling. According to the report, the state police of Maharashtra “can now bank on a forensic tool to achieve speedy convictions”.
I choose the following words carefully: the utter irresponsibility involved here, and its attendant outrage of justice, is staggering. It is yet another example of how technology is increasingly misapplied and abused, and represents a major threat to civil liberties.
BEOS profiling is a hopelessly crude procedure piggy-backing on sophisticated brain scanning techniques which reveal the involvement of regions of the brain in emotion, movement, memory and other functions. It involves an electroencephalogram combined with a word association test. EEG electrodes are placed on a subject’s head, and a text is read out. Intensification of EEG readings simultaneous with given phrases are interpreted as constituting the sought-for evidence of – in the case of the accused in the Maharashtra murder trial – guilt.
Advertisement
How so? The BEOS technique, developed by Bangalore neuroscientist C. R. Mukundan, proceeds thus. The subject sits in silence, eyes closed, with the electrodes in place. A policeman reads out the police account of the crime. The EEG shows the brain “lighting up” in those regions “associated” with “memory of actual involvement” in the events being described. This actual involvement is distinguishable, allegedly, from a memory of having read about the crime, say, and from stress or other emotional states incident upon being accused of murder and subjected to a “test of guilt” no different in probative value from a ducking stool.
Functional MRI scans are able to correlate activity in brain regions with specifiable autonomic and psychological functions. The correlations hold between types of brain activity and general functions, such as memory, but neither fMRI nor any other scan can allow a researcher to say “you are thinking of Doris Day”, or “you are visualising the colour red”. Such fine-grained discriminations might forever be an impossibility, given the unique learning and memory-storing history of individual brains.
The BEOS technique claims to identify activity that occurs in brains only when memories acquired through actual participation in an event are evoked by word association.
This is vastly less plausible even than the theory behind the now-discredited “lie detector test”, which postulates that when people lie, the electrochemistry underlying their emotional states can be registered by the polygraph, as if everyone feels stress when lying, and as if lying-specific stress were distinguishable from other motives for stress, such as being under suspicion.
In fact, we now know that what polygraphs detect is anxiety, and since anxiety has many more sources than lying, and since lying does not always provoke anxiety, polygraphs are not merely useless but dangerous. How much worse, then, is the BEOS technique?
India’s BEOS-condemned suspects may indeed be murderers, but proving their guilt beyond reasonable doubt requires objective evidence. An evidentially unsupported confession of guilt cannot be regarded as legally safe in a court of law, because it might have been coerced or made under abnormal stress. EEG readings from the head of a silent suspect are infinitely less reliable than such a confession.
India has seen a travesty of justice in this case, which should send a loud warning to the world: there is a long way to go even before greatly more sophisticated brain-scanning methods than EEG can be used as a reliable means of gaining involuntary access to people’s thoughts and memories – if ever such an Orwellian thing could be tolerated in a civilised society.
“India has seen a travesty of justice, and this should send a loud warning”
Read all A C Grayling’s columns here
The Human Brain – With one hundred billion nerve cells, the complexity is mind-boggling. Learn more in our cutting edge special report.