èƵ

Insight: Has President Bush turned green?

The US president announces a significant increase in clean-energy research funding, but his motives may not be as green as they sound

IT WAS, for a moment, as if we were in an alternative reality in which Al Gore had emerged victorious from the 2000 presidential election. “America is addicted to oil,” said George W. Bush on 31 January, in his annual State of the Union address. “So tonight, I announce the Advanced Energy Initiative – a 22 per cent increase in clean-energy research.”

Nowadays Gore is promoting his film An Inconvenient Truth, which highlights the threat posed by global warming. Bush’s words could have come straight from its script. The president’s address also heralded a 10-year doubling of spending on research in the physical sciences. Gore would doubtless approve.

So has the ex-oilman president undergone a Damascene conversion to a green, high-tech future? Not quite, judging from Bush’s budget request to Congress, released on Monday. While this seeks to boost research into solar cells, it also stresses the use of “clean” coal, would eliminate research on geothermal power, and cuts energy efficiency programmes. Cheerleaders for green energy find little to be pleased about in the numbers.

The commitment to research in the physical sciences seems real. Bush’s budget would increase funding by 9.3 per cent, on track for the 10-year target. “That is a dramatic change,” says Kei Koizumi, who monitors federal spending for the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

However, Bush’s move can be explained in one word: China. The boost for physical sciences follows lobbying by industrialists, who fear that the US will lose its economic lead if it fails to invest in innovation. China tops their worry list. China’s mushrooming energy demands also require a response: there just isn’t enough oil in the planet’s tank to satisfy two voracious superpowers. Welcome to the 21st century, George W. – China’s century.