èƵ

We can rebuild them…

The technology to build the world's first bionic limbs is almost within our grasp, says Duncan Graham-Rowe

ACCORDING to ancient history, the Persian warrior Hegesistratus escaped from his enemies in 484 BC by cutting off his own foot to escape his shackles. The soldier later took to wearing a wooden foot. If the tale is true, this would be the first recorded use of a prosthetic limb.

Artificial legs, arms and hands – often hooks – followed. But it took two millennia for the next major advance to emerge, when French army surgeon Ambroise Pare designed a more natural “articulated”, or jointed, leg in 1529. The prosthetic leg had made the technological leap from rigid pole to a more natural, flexible limb.

Today we are on the verge of seeing an even more important advance in prosthetics that should transform the lives of people who have lost arms or legs – the development of the ultimate bionic limb, wired directly into the nervous system. Recipients will be able to move these devices by the power of thought alone, as well as receive lifelike sensations from them. Sensory feedback from artificial limbs is in fact turning out to play a surprisingly important role in the development of responsive, naturalistic devices.

As ambitious as these goals may sound, the debut of the bionic limb could be surprisingly close – perhaps within the next five years. Researchers in the US, Europe and Japan have overcome many of the obstacles, and human trials of the first crude prototypes have already begun. “A large part of it is now just putting the pieces together,” says Ronald Riso, a biomedical engineer at Aalborg University in Denmark who is one of the prosthetic pioneers.

Today’s artificial limbs are already highly advanced. The most sophisticated prosthetic hands can be made to open and close via electromyography, a recording technique where special sensors detect electrical activity within the wearer’s arm muscles, which are connected by circuits to the hand’s motors. So by flexing their arm muscles, wearers can make their prosthetic hand grip objects or release them. The motors are powered by rechargeable batteries, which last for about a day.

While these devices are no doubt greatly valued by some amputees, they can be very awkward to use, especially initially. Some studies have shown that as many as half of owners do not use their prosthetic limb regularly because the device is ineffective, cumbersome, or just plain ugly.

So what will the artificial limbs of the future be like? They may well look something like Cyberhand, a prosthetic hand that will be jacked directly into the nervous system. It is being developed by a collaboration of scientists from four European countries.

For a start, the hand’s mechanical design is going to be more sophisticated. Unlike existing prosthetics, Cyberhand’s five digits will each have independent motors that can be controlled separately. According to Paolo Dario, a mechanical engineer at the Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies in Pisa, Italy, who is leading the team developing the hand’s machinery, Cyberhand users should be sufficiently dextrous to use a pair of scissors.

Fitting all the joints, motors, sensors, electronics and batteries into such a small space is a significant engineering challenge. Weight is another limiting factor, says team member Fabrizio Vecchi, as the hand should ideally be no heavier than about 600 grams, like a real one. “The number of batteries could be a problem,” he points out, given all those power-hungry motors. But Vecchi reckons that by the end of the year, a prototype Cyberhand will be ready that can be controlled by electromyography, like existing devices.

Meanwhile, other Cyberhand researchers are working on ways to connect the hand to the same nerves in the forearm that once served the person’s original hand. To do so they are having to design new kinds of electrodes that can act as an interface between the hand’s electronic circuits and the body’s nerves.

One set of electrodes will need to record the outgoing (or “motor”) nerve signals coming from the brain, and translate these into electronic signals to operate the hand’s machinery. A second set must translate the artificial sensations generated within the hand into signals that can be picked up by the sensory nerves leading from the arm to the brain.

Why should sensory feedback be so important? We couldn’t use our real limbs very well without it. Imagine trying to pick up a glass when you don’t know how hard you are gripping it – too lightly and it will slip, too hard and it could be crushed. As for reaching into your pocket for some keys, or fumbling for the light switch in the dark, sensation is vital.

There are four different types of touch receptors in the skin, sensing acute pressure, sustained pressure, vibration or skin stretch. But there’s another kind of sensory perception that also plays a crucial role – the “proprioception” signalling from our muscles, tendons and joints, which gives the brain information on the body’s positioning and movement. This is vital for precise control of movements and general body awareness – to let you know your arm’s position without having to look at it, say.

èƵs believe such sensory feedback will play an important role in helping the brain learn to use an artificial limb – just as a baby learns to use its limbs for the first time. When sensory neurons convey the information that a body part is moving in the desired way, that strengthens connections between the neurons that brought about that movement.

Over the past few years, novel animal research by Miguel Nicolelis and colleagues at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina, has lent credence to this idea. They managed to train monkeys to move a mechanical arm just by willing it, using electrodes in the animals’ brains to detect their intentions (èƵ, 23 February 2002, p 26). Key to the project’s success, says Nicolelis, was allowing the animals to watch the arm’s movement, to give them positive feedback when they were doing it right. “We noticed a reorganisation of the cortex,” he says. “The properties of the robot arm were being assimilated as if they were a part of the animal’s own body.” Nicolelis believes that if the animals had been given proprioception and touch sensations from the arm, they would have learned even faster.

Well wired

So what are the challenges involved in wiring a prosthetic hand directly into the nervous system? A major hurdle is devising electrodes that can communicate with individual neurons and that will stay in place. “It is very difficult to fix the microelectrode at a certain position for a long time,” says Mabuchi Kunihiko, a medical engineer heading a similar project to Cyberhand, based at the University of Tokyo.

The state-of-the-art “cuff electrode” is a collar-shaped device that encircles whole nerve fibres, comprising several thousand neurons. Riso’s Cyberhand team at Aalborg University has tried temporarily implanting these into volunteers. The patients reported it felt “tingly”, says Riso, a little like a vibration, most probably because groups of neurons were being stimulated simultaneously. While this is not ideal, it’s better than nothing, he says.

The team is now recruiting volunteers who are willing to have the electrodes permanently implanted to assess how acceptable these sensations are in the long term. The patients will not initially get a prosthetic hand, but the researchers plan to use this group as guinea pigs for future versions of Cyberhand. The patients should not have wires sticking out of their stumps, fortunately, as it is possible to use radio signals to communicate between the hand and implanted electrodes.

Another Cyberhand research group, led by Xavier Navarro, a neuroscientist at the Independent University of Barcelona, Spain, is trying a different approach. They are investigating using a “sieve electrode”, currently used in neuroregeneration research. As the name suggests, each electrode has many holes in it, each one capable of delivering a separate electrical signal. The aim is to get individual neurons to grow through the holes, so they can be stimulated one at a time.

Unfortunately, peripheral neurons are a gregarious lot – they seem to prefer to grow alongside other neurons. In experiments on rats, Navarro’s team has so far managed to get groups of between 10 and 40 neurons to grow through holes with a diameter of 40 micrometres. The trouble is, when he makes the holes any smaller, no neurons will grow through them. But 40 micrometres may do to start with, he says, so his group is now assessing the long-term safety of this approach with a view to starting human trials.

Perhaps the furthest advances in this field, however, come from researchers at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, led by bioengineer Ken Horch. They are using a new type of electrode, nicknamed the “bed of nails”. This is a platform of needle-like points that each transmit separate electrical signals. The device is implanted so that each “nail” lies next to an individual nerve fibre. “They are fairly resistant to movement,” says Horch.

Last year the researchers gained approval to implant this type of electrode into human amputees for a few hours. In as yet unpublished work, the electrodes were wired up to a table-mounted mechanical arm that had pressure sensors on its surface and proprioception sensors within the motors. According to Horch, when the researchers moved the arm or made it grip objects, the volunteers reported that they could indeed feel appropriate sensations. They even gave a rough indication of the amount of gripping force they were applying. “We elicited touch and proprioceptive sensations of finger movement and position,” he says. “According to the subjects, the sensations felt normal.”

Although this research is still in the early stages, the fact that the patients described natural-feeling sensations bodes well, and suggests that Horch’s electrodes are achieving close to one-to-one correspondence from electrode to neuron.

As if the prospect of tapping into a patient’s peripheral nervous system isn’t futuristic enough, other scientists are considering wiring one directly into the brain. Again, two sets of electrodes would be needed, to record outgoing motor signals, and pass on incoming sensory information. These would have to be relayed to the artificial limb either via electronic circuitry or radio.

Although this approach would clearly be more invasive, it has a distinct advantage, according to one of the researchers, John Chapin at the State University of New York. Brain implants would be more likely to stay put, because there wouldn’t be the movement of muscle and bone to jostle them about.

Work such as Nicolelis’s monkey research has shown that, in animals at least, it is possible to pick up the motor signals from the brain that control limb movement. Chapin is now collaborating with Nicolelis to try to improve the system by providing it with sensory feedback, which they are doing by implanting electrodes in the monkeys’ brains. They are about to start the extensive animal safety testing that will have to be carried out before such an invasive procedure can be carried out in humans.

Some researchers are trying to use this type of technology to benefit quite a different group of patients: those who have been paralysed after spinal cord injuries (see “Getting to grips with paralysis”). They want to reconnect people’s brains to their limbs electronically, essentially bypassing the damaged spinal cord.

The first generation of bionic limbs will not, of course, be able to replicate the exquisitely precise sensory and motor functions of the flesh-and-blood limbs they are replacing. The first hands are likely to have only tens of sensors – rather less than the thousands in a human hand. For one thing, there is little point in putting lots of sensors in the device until we know how the brain will interpret data from an artificial limb. Will people eventually become so accustomed to the artificial sensations that they feel completely natural?

In a recent interview, paralysed actor Christopher Reeve spoke of how he missed being able to feel the warmth of someone holding his hand. “This is what we’re up against,” says Chapin. “I don’t think we’ll be able to restore all of the complexities of touch, but I think we can restore part of it. And that will be a big quality-of-life improvement.”

We can rebuild them...

Getting to grips with paralysis

The same technology being developed to give amputees direct neural control over their prosthetic limbs could be used to help people who have been paralysed after spinal cord injuries. Their arm and leg muscles are, after all, still functional – it is damaged nerves at the injury site that are the problem.

A system known as functional electrical stimulation (FES) is already used as a form of physiotherapy for such patients. Electrodes on the skin (or on the muscle) deliver a controlled electrical current, which triggers the muscles to contract automatically.

Researchers at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio, have used FES to return hand function to people who are partially paralysed. Their set-up helps patients who are paralysed from the chest down, but can still move their shoulders or chest muscles and have limited arm movements. The system, called Freehand, allows patients to use a chest-mounted joystick-like device to transmit signals to FES electrodes implanted in their hand muscles, allowing them to open and close their hands at will. More than 160 patients are now successfully using the system.

Because the patients lack sensory signalling from their hand, however, it is hard for them to control the strength of their grip. Sophisticated versions of Freehand include thimble-like touch sensors on the fingertips. These detect whether an object is slipping from a patient’s grasp, and automatically signal to the FES electrodes to make the hand muscles contract more.

But what about getting patients’ own sensory neurons to do the job? Ronald Riso of the Cyberhand project has helped Freehand scientists commandeer the touch neurons in a patient’s fingers. So far, three volunteers have had cuff electrodes implanted in their palm around the sensory nerves. These are connected by circuitry to a belt-worn microprocessor that feeds back to the FES electrodes. So the patients’ own sensory neurons are helping to modulate their grip.

FES could even help people paralysed from the neck down, if used in combination with Mind Switch, developed by Ashley Craig and colleagues at the University of Technology in Sydney, Australia. Patients wear a cap containing electrodes that measure electrical activity in the brain. The system look for alpha waves, which wearers can learn to induce and control.

Researchers led by Glen Davis at the University of Sydney are using FES to stimulate the leg muscles in coordinated sequences so that patients can stand or even walk haltingly. Davis and Craig are now planning to merge their two systems to allow paraplegics to get up and walk, simply by blinking.