WHAT鈥檚 the point of gauging the environmental impact of a dam before it鈥檚
built? Not a lot, if a row over a proposed hydroelectric scheme in Belize is
anything to go by.
A group of leading biologists reckon the Chalillo dam would destroy an area
of rainforest containing rare and threatened species. But the companies that
commissioned the biologists鈥� report are not following its recommendation that
the dam should not be built, one of the report鈥檚 authors told 快猫短视频.
The dispute has highlighted growing concerns over the value placed on
鈥渆nvironmental impact assessments鈥�. Last year, a report by the World Commission
on Dams warned that recommendations about whether a dam should go ahead are no
longer welcomed鈥攃ontrary to the intention when EIAs were introduced in the
1970s. Instead, EIAs have evolved into devices 鈥渢o render dams acceptable when
the decision to proceed has already been taken鈥� by recommending ways to lessen
their impact, says the commission.
Advertisement
快猫短视频s from the Natural History Museum in London conducted an EIA of the
proposed dam project, which is scheduled to start construction next month in the
former British colony of Belize in Central America. In their official report,
the researchers say that the Chalillo dam would do irreparable harm to one of
the most biologically rich and diverse regions left in Central America, and they
鈥渉ighly recommend鈥� that the scheme be dropped.
鈥淲hat is the point of scientists undertaking environmental assessments if
they are ignored or rubbished rather than being taken into proper
consideration?鈥� asks Alastair Rogers, a co-author of the report.
The proposed 35-metre dam is to be built on a remote stretch of Belize鈥檚
Macal River and produce electricity for the surrounding provinces. It would
flood 11 square kilometres of the river鈥檚 pristine forested flood plain in
remote mountains near the border with Guatemala.
The area contains rare species such as jaguar, Baird鈥檚 tapir, Morelet鈥檚
crocodile, ocelot, howler monkey and a population of 60 to 100 scarlet
macaws鈥攁 subspecies of parrot of which fewer than a thousand remain
worldwide. The report says the dam would 鈥渃ause a rapid reduction and probable
eventual extirpation鈥� of the birds.
The Canadian arm of the British engineering firm AMEC, a consultant on the
construction of the $30 million project, commissioned the Natural History
Museum to analyse the impact of the dam on wildlife as part of a wider EIA. The
company has shunted its 105-page report into an appendix to the five-volume
assessment, prefaced with a warning saying that it is 鈥渁 draft report, and
readers should formulate their conclusions accordingly鈥�.
But Rogers told 快猫短视频: 鈥淭here are many scientists who are
deeply concerned about this project and believe the facts speak for themselves.鈥�
Rogers, a colonel in the British Royal Marine Reserve, has led five scientific
expeditions to the dam region.
AMEC denies trying to bury the report. Fortis, the Canadian company that runs
Belize鈥檚 electricity industry and will own the dam, says that the report
contains significant inaccuracies, including false claims that several species
are endangered. The scientists deny this.
Fortis chief executive Stanley Marshall also recently claimed on Canadian
radio that 鈥渇rom the time this report went to Britain it has been continuously
leaked to environment groups and influenced by them鈥�. But Rogers denies that
activists have influenced the report. In a letter to the Belize government in
September he said: 鈥淚t is absolutely clear that constructing a dam at Chalillo
would cause major, irreversible negative environmental impacts and destroy many
important archaeological sites.鈥�
