Copyrights and Copywrongs by Siva Vaidhyanathan, New York University Press,
$27.95, ISBN 0814788068
WHO owns and controls scientific papers: researchers or universities? Should
Napster be allowed to distribute other people鈥檚 music over the Web? Questions
such as these have propelled copyright scholars blinking into the limelight. But
just what rights should authors and artists have over their work?
Siva Vaidhyanathan sets out to argue for reducing copyright law to the
absolute minimum. He rejects the concept underpinning British and much American
law鈥攖hat copyright is a property right. Logically enough, I suppose,
because property is perpetual and his goal is to get everything rapidly into the
public domain. He rejects the alternative, continental European view that sees
an author鈥檚 rights as synonymous with their human rights. Maybe it鈥檚 because
鈥渘atural rights鈥 conflict with the utilitarian free market ideology. Or perhaps
it鈥檚 simply because they are un-American, and this is a book about American law
and culture.
Advertisement
The most interesting thing about this book is its historical perspective on
US legal discourse. The utterances of the Founding Fathers and Oliver Wendell
Holmes are picked over with an enthusiasm resembling the medieval natural
theologian鈥檚 reverence for Aristotle.
In the end, it鈥檚 not clear that Vaidhyanathan has progressed beyond the
teenager鈥檚 cry of 鈥淲hy can鈥檛 I do what I like?鈥 He deals only with conflict
between users and 鈥渞ightsholders鈥, and wholly neglects the recent US supreme
court ruling that electronic news distribution must have a separate copyright
authorisation. The lesson of this case is that the bigger conflict is between
authors/researchers and publishers. His book bears a copyright notice, of
course: it鈥檚 owned outright by New York University.