THE golden jewellery, found in an intact Royal Macedonian tomb in 1977, is
exquisite. It is now the prize exhibit in the archaeological museum in
Thessaloniki and the label says that it came from the tomb of Philip II,
Alexander the Great’s father.
But a Greek anthropologist has re-examined the skeleton found in the tomb and
his findings—published last week—show that it is not Philip II’s,
but that of Alexander’s half-brother, Philip III. Although Philip III is not as
well known as his father, this doesn’t diminish the importance of the treasure.
Antonis Bartsiokas, from the Anaximandrian Institute of Human Evolution, in
Voula, says that Philip III inherited some of Alexander’s riches.
When the tomb was first opened there were two skeletons—one a man’s and
one a woman’s. An eye wound originally identified the male as Philip II. A
warlike king, he suffered several injuries in battle and a wound to his femur
left him lame. He was blinded in one eye by an arrow at the battle of Methone in
354 BC—18 years before he was assassinated.
Advertisement
The male skeleton showed no signs of body wounds. But there was a bony bump
close to his right eye, which the original researchers took to be signs of
mending, and a groove in the skull below the eye which could have been caused by
the arrow. They also found ivory heads in the tomb, including those of Philip II
and Alexander.
But Bartsiokas says that the bump is a normal feature of the skull. And he
found no evidence of bone healing in the groove. He says that the bone probably
cracked when the body was being cremated and remained after the bones were glued
back together when the skull was restored in the 1980s. Furthermore, the ivory
head of Philip II also has a nick on the right eyebrow, presumably representing
the eye wound. But the cut runs the opposite way from the groove on the
cheekbone.
Philip III became King of Macedonia after Alexander’s death in Babylon in 323
BC. But Philip III, unlike his father and half brother, was no warrior. When he
too was assassinated in 317 BC he was initially buried like a commoner, before
being exhumed six months later and given a royal cremation.
The clinching piece of evidence is the state of the cremated bones. If bones
come from a skeleton that was cremated with flesh on them—as Philip II’s
was—they warp and have curved fractures. But bones cremated
dry—without flesh on them—have small straight fractures. Bartsiokas
says the bones were cremated dry.
“This is very plausible and exciting,” says Bob Arnott, a specialist in
ancient medical history at the University of Birmingham. “I think it is a
realistic assessment,” he says.

- Source: Science(vol 288, p 511)