THEY live underground. They are everywhere but seem to come from nowhere.
They barely exist, but never leave. If sounds have shadows, they are the shadows
of a sound.
Researchers call them the background free oscillations of the Earth. But last
year, when a pair of Japanese geophysicists named Naoki Suda and Kazunari Nawa
dredged them out of a mass of seismic data, some people called them a hum.
That鈥檚 a comforting thought: a mystic Om, perhaps, or just the warm, cosy sound
of a planet going about its business.
Don鈥檛 try to tune in, you鈥檒l never hear it, though. The Hum is far too low
for human ears to detect and is so feeble that a single 5.5-magnitude earthquake
can blot it out. That鈥檚 just as well because, if you could hear it, the Hum
might drive you mad.
Advertisement
鈥淚t鈥檚 a very messy noise,鈥� says Hiroo Kanamori, a geophysicist at the
California Institute of Technology. Messy because the Hum is not one note but
fifty, crammed into less than two octaves. Their pitches range between 2 and 7
millihertz. Musically speaking, that鈥檚 about sixteen octaves below middle C.
Speeded up and amplified so you could hear it, the result would be a
Stockhausenesque cacophony. Imagine sitting down at a piano and slamming down
every note within reach, while somebody next to you does the same thing on a
piano a quarter tone out of tune. 鈥淚t would be like banging a trash can,鈥�
Kanamori says. Endlessly.
The individual notes are pleasant enough. They are the natural tones that the
Earth makes whenever something鈥攁n earthquake, a meteor, a nuclear
test鈥攕ets it ringing. They are known as 鈥渇ree鈥� oscillations because, like
the clang of a bell or the twang of a guitar string, they keep on sounding for a
while after their source is gone.
What鈥檚 peculiar about the notes in the Hum is that they have no obvious
source. Not earthquakes, not nuclear explosions, nothing. The vibrations
triggered by cataclysmic events fade away to nothing, but the Hum continues,
regardless.
So what鈥檚 the cause? It is hard to tell because, like the tone of a bell,
free oscillations sound much the same no matter what sets them going. The
three-dimensional patterns of vibrations, known as modes, depend mainly on how
big the Earth is and what it is made of, not on what excites them. So free
oscillations reveal plenty about the layers of rock they pass through, but are
coy about their own origins.
Looking at the particular frequencies and energies does give some
clues鈥攅nough to rule out the usual Earth-shaking events. So researchers
are turning to stranger ideas to explain the Earth鈥檚 never-ending mantra.
快猫短视频s knew that free oscillations ought to exist long before they
managed to detect them. At the turn of the century, seismologists were already
detecting ordinary seismic waves鈥攖he short, sharp shocks of
earthquakes鈥攁nd using them to probe the depths of the Earth. Before the
First World War, physicists had proved that those relatively high-pitched
seismic waves ought to set the whole surface of the planet a-tremble with
patterns of lower-frequency standing waves. But the planetary plainsong eluded
researchers for decades.
The problem was their equipment was too crude. Even a simple seismograph can
convert the lurching motion of an earthquake into the jump of a needle. Free
oscillations, however, are much more elusive. Not only do they vibrate much more
slowly and more subtly than ordinary seismic waves, they are also considerably
more complex: three-dimensional tangles of vibrations at scores of different
frequencies and pointing in different directions. To identify them,
seismologists must tease out all the components, using a procedure called
Fourier analysis to separate the different frequencies. The calculations are
straightforward but too tedious to undertake by hand. By the late 1950s
computers had solved that problem, but seismic detectors still weren鈥檛
sharp-eared enough to pick up the oscillations from normal-sized sources.
Then nature let loose a blast nobody could miss. On 22 May 1960, the most
powerful earthquake ever recorded struck southern Chile. The quake, now rated at
magnitude 9.5, set the Earth鈥檚 interior jangling. Earth scientists scrambled to
dissect the vibrations and discover what they could tell about the Earth鈥檚
vibrational modes, and the elasticity and density of its interior.
In the decades that followed, seismometers grew ever more sensitive. By the
1970s and 1980s, global networks of seismic stations were monitoring the
vibrations of the Earth round the clock, and any seismologist or geophysicist
craving information could download it as easily as turning on a tap. Over and
over again, geoscientists witnessed a classic pattern: the shriek of an
earthquake striking a resounding chord of free oscillations.
Meanwhile, between earthquakes, the Earth hummed away unnoticed.
The vibrations were there, all right; they were just extremely subtle. Rudolf
Widmer-Schnidrig, a German geophysicist at the Scripps Institution of
Oceanography in California, calculates that the power of the Hum is a mere 500
watts worldwide鈥攂arely enough to run five ordinary light bulbs. Even so,
by the 1980s seismic instruments were perfectly capable of detecting it, and
they did. Background free oscillations were plainly visible, for example, in the
noise plots researchers used to gauge the quality of seismometers. But
geophysicists paid the oscillations no more heed than the background hiss of a
vinyl record.
The Hum almost came to light in the late 1980s, when a team at the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology noticed that the Earth was oscillating
even when there had been no earthquakes to set it in motion. The investigators
decided that the vibrations must be due to 鈥渟low鈥� or 鈥渟ilent鈥� earthquakes,
mysterious seismic events that were thought to release energy gradually, without
any faults rupturing. Unable to pin down where the supposed slow quakes were
taking place, however, the MIT researchers lost interest. The Hum never crossed
their minds.
Then, in 1997, Suda and Nawa came on the scene and turned things upside down.
Instead of starting with oscillations and looking for earthquakes to explain
them, they looked between the earthquakes for oscillations they couldn鈥檛
explain. Suda, a seismologist then at Nagoya University, and Nawa, then working
on his doctorate under Suda鈥檚 supervision, took their inspiration from a
little-noticed paper by Naoki Kobayashi, a theorist at the Tokyo Institute of
Technology. Kobayashi predicted that the Earth鈥檚 atmosphere ought to excite free
oscillations in the Earth. Suda and Nawa set about finding them.
Nawa had just spent a year at Japan鈥檚 Syowa Station in Antarctica, tending a
device called a superconducting gravimeter. The instrument had been installed to
look for a controversial hour-long oscillation of the Earth鈥檚 core, but it could
also pick up shorter-period vibrations. Suda suggested that Nawa check its
records for evidence of unexplained free oscillations. Meanwhile, Suda combed
through archived data from seismic stations around the world. Then they started
crunching numbers.
鈥淚t鈥檚 actually not that sophisticated, which is why those of us who didn鈥檛 do
this can all be moderately embarrassed,鈥� says Duncan Agnew, a geophysicist also
at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography. 鈥淵ou take the stations with the
lowest noise. You take the days when there are no earthquakes. For each day, you
take a Fourier transform of the data, which shows the distribution of energy
with different frequencies. And then you simply add up all the days.鈥�
The result was a jagged graph showing a series of 鈥渟pectral peaks鈥�, the
frequencies at which the Earth oscillated in the lulls between large
earthquakes. Nawa and Suda then subtracted everything that they could account
for by known sources, including a theoretical estimate of the effects of
earthquakes small enough to slip through the seismic net. They wound up with a
residue of faint vibrations with no known source: the Hum. Nawa and Suda
announced their results in 1998, and other researchers quickly confirmed them.
The vibrations, it turned out, had been buzzing in their ears all along.
鈥淭he mystery is, where do they come from?鈥� says G枚ran Ekstr枚m, a
geophysicist at Harvard University. Ekstr枚m and most other geophysicists
hope they have an underground source that might reveal something new about the
depths of the Earth: slow earthquakes, the rumbling of tectonic plates or some
exotic seismic process in a little-studied part of the Earth, such as oceanic
fracture zones鈥攑laces where the seafloor is being ripped apart in a
complicated pattern of faults.
Earthquakes, an early favourite, started to lose their lustre on closer
examination. When an earthquake strikes, it pounds out a chord made of
frequencies from all the vibrational modes at the same time. In the Hum, by
contrast, individual 鈥渘otes鈥� constantly drop out and reappear鈥攁 different
style of music. For a while, deep-earth enthusiasts took heart from a strange
signal in Nawa鈥檚 Antarctic recordings. The gravimeter picked up oscillations
with periods as long as 54 minutes鈥攖oo long, in theory, to have been
produced near the surface of the Earth. But those signals have not shown up in
any other data, and Suda now thinks they must have come from a source at or near
Syowa Station, perhaps buildings shuddering in the wind.
Now geophysicists are considering the possibility that the Hum could be
generated above ground鈥攁nd has little to do with their beloved rocks. Take
the oceans. For seismologists listening for earthquakes, the pounding of surf
along the world鈥檚 coastlines is a constant annoyance. As waves crash onto the
shore they create a 6-10 second thrum that can drown out the crackle of slipping
faults. Some of that energy might excite the longer-period modes that make up
the Hum. At present, though, oceanic sources look like a long shot. The smart
money seems to be on Kobayashi鈥檚 original bet, the atmosphere.
Could thin air really pack enough punch to turn the Earth into a huge aeolian
harp? Easily, says Toshiro Tanimoto, from the University of California, Santa
Barbara, a key proponent of the atmospheric-excitation hypothesis. The
atmosphere receives enough energy from the Sun to keep the Earth humming
thousands of times over.
In Tanimoto鈥檚 opinion, the humming starts with drumming, the constant throb
of fluctuating atmospheric pressure all over the Earth. When air pressure rises,
the atmosphere presses down slightly harder on the ground or sea beneath it.
When the pressure drops, the surface gently rebounds. In other words, the world
is like a gong being constantly buffeted by countless soft rubber mallets. And
at any given moment, some of them will be tapping at the right frequencies to
excite the modes that make up the Hum.
Tanimoto has worked out exactly how energy from the atmosphere could be
converted into the oscillations Suda and Nawa observed. His model predicts that
the sounding of the global gong ought to vary over the course of a year, peaking
in winter, when atmospheric pressure is highest and the airy mallets hit
hardest. To test that prediction, Tanimoto analysed readings from 15
exceptionally quiet seismic stations scattered around the globe. By adding
together spectral peaks from many years鈥� worth of records, he amplified the
vibrations until he could see subtle changes in their intensity. At each station
Tanimoto checked, the Hum grew about 10 per cent louder between December and
February and between June and August鈥攚inter in the northern and southern
hemispheres respectively.
That twice-yearly rise in volume is the clincher, he says. 鈥淧rocesses in the
solid Earth cannot possibly explain seasonal variations. There may be some slow
movements of the Earth, but they don鈥檛 happen in a seasonal fashion.鈥� And Suda
has recently found evidence that the Hum also varies over the course of a
day鈥攆urther support for a source above ground.
An air-driven hum would be ho-hum for geophysicists, because it probably
could not tell them anything they haven鈥檛 already learned from the louder,
cleaner signals of earthquakes. But even if continuous free oscillations turn
out to be of no earthly use, they may have unearthly ones. After all, if the Hum
starts in the atmosphere, then other planets with atmospheres ought to hum, too,
and some researchers think background free oscillations could be just the ticket
for studying their interiors. That鈥檚 particularly likely to be true of a cool,
tectonically dead planet such as Mars. Marsquakes are thought to be rare, but
the Martian hum, if it exists, will always be turned on鈥攆aint, but
available.
Philippe Lognonn茅, a geophysicist at the Institute of the Physics of
the Earth in Paris, is in charge of coordinating the experiments for the first
mission to explore Mars鈥檚 geology. The Netlander mission, due to be launched in
2005, will place four seismic stations on Mars. Broadband seismometers will
record a wide range of vibrations, including those likely to be found in a
Martian hum, and relay the information back to Earth for one Martian year (about
two Earth years).
To get some idea of what to expect, Lognonn茅 and Fran莽ois
Forget, an atmospheric scientist at the Pierre and Marie Curie University of
Paris, are creating computer models of the Martian atmosphere and the free
oscillations it might kick up inside the planet. Though the air on Mars is much
thinner than that on the Earth, Lognonn茅 says, the violent winds that
tear across the Red Planet鈥檚 surface ought to set Mars ringing,
too鈥攑ossibly as loudly as the Earth does. And with less background noise
to interfere, the vibrations may be easier to detect. If so, they could give
valuable information about the planet鈥檚 mantle, about which next to nothing is
known.
It鈥檚 possible, of course, that Mars doesn鈥檛 hum at all. The background free
oscillations on Earth may turn out to come from the oceans, which Mars lacks, or
from some subterranean process unique to our planet. But even if researchers
never put the Hum to a practical use, its small, persistent whisper is a
reminder that there are still mysterious things going on right under their
noses. 鈥淲hatever the explanation is, we鈥檒l learn from it,鈥� Ekstr枚m says.
鈥淎nd until we do, it鈥檚 fun to speculate.鈥�