快猫短视频

Flying into danger

Are astronauts exposed to unnecessary hazards?

NASA chief Dan Goldin is getting tough with agency officials he believes
aren鈥檛 doing enough to ensure astronauts鈥 safety.

In November, the NASA Advisory Council, a panel of engineers and scientists
that advises the agency, was shocked to discover that nobody had done a
鈥減robabilistic risk assessment鈥 (PRA) for the International Space Station,
despite the high likelihood that something will go wrong
(鈥淚SS Titanic鈥, 快猫短视频, 14 November 1998, p 38).

At that time, Frederick Gregory of NASA鈥檚 Office of Safety and Mission
Assurance promised the council that a PRA would be performed. But little has
been done. 鈥淭o do a PRA for the station would be a monumental activity,鈥 Gregory
told 快猫短视频. 鈥淚t would take as much time to do as has already
been spent on developing the station.鈥

At a meeting in Washington DC late last month, Goldin apologised to the
advisory council for the safety office鈥檚 performance. 鈥淵ou asked for a PRA. I
don鈥檛 feel that the space station team has addressed this with the seriousness
that鈥檚 necessary.鈥 He told the council he had personally initiated an
assessment.

The space station is not the only focus of safety concerns. The designs for a
proposed reusable launch vehicle have displeased Goldin because they do not give
the crew a way to escape if the craft runs into trouble during launch. 鈥淰ladimir
Titov sat on top of a Proton rocket that exploded under him. He鈥檚 still alive,
he flew on the shuttle, and he has a family,鈥 he told the advisory council.
鈥淭his is because the Russians said: `We will not compromise safety.'鈥 Goldin
added: 鈥淚 personally asked our people to assure safety, from engine ignition
through main engine cutoff. We do not have it.鈥

Goldin fears that this could lead to a repeat of the 1986 Challenger shuttle
disaster: 鈥淣ASA might be on the verge of making another mistake.鈥

More from 快猫短视频

Explore the latest news, articles and features